January 25, 2017 Executive Order: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States (Regarding Sanctuary Cities)

fickeymartinez • February 3, 2017

Sanctuary Cities are being challenged by the Executive Order. See Below:

Executive Order: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States

EXECUTIVE ORDER

– – – – – – –

ENHANCING PUBLIC SAFETY IN THE INTERIOR OF THE
UNITED STATES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), and in order to ensure the public safety of the American people in communities across the United States as well as to ensure that our Nation’s immigration laws are faithfully executed, I hereby declare the policy of the executive branch to be, and order, as follows:

Section 1.  Purpose.  Interior enforcement of our Nation’s immigration laws is critically important to the national security and public safety of the United States.  Many aliens who illegally enter the United States and those who overstay or otherwise violate the terms of their visas present a significant threat to national security and public safety.  This is particularly so for aliens who engage in criminal conduct in the United States.

Sanctuary jurisdictions across the United States willfully violate Federal law in an attempt to shield aliens from removal from the United States.  These jurisdictions have caused immeasurable harm to the American people and to the very fabric of our Republic.

Tens of thousands of removable aliens have been released into communities across the country, solely because their home countries refuse to accept their repatriation.  Many of these aliens are criminals who have served time in our Federal, State, and local jails.  The presence of such individuals in the United States, and the practices of foreign nations that refuse the repatriation of their nationals, are contrary to the national interest.

Although Federal immigration law provides a framework for Federal-State partnerships in enforcing our immigration laws to ensure the removal of aliens who have no right to be in the United States, the Federal Government has failed to discharge this basic sovereign responsibility.  We cannot faithfully execute the immigration laws of the United States if we exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement.  The purpose of this order is to direct executive departments and agencies (agencies) to employ all lawful means to enforce the immigration laws of the United States.

Sec. 2.  Policy.  It is the policy of the executive branch to:

(a)  Ensure the faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States, including the INA, against all removable aliens, consistent with Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution and section 3331 of title 5, United States Code;

(b)  Make use of all available systems and resources to ensure the efficient and faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States;

(c)  Ensure that jurisdictions that fail to comply with applicable Federal law do not receive Federal funds, except as mandated by law;

(d)  Ensure that aliens ordered removed from the United States are promptly removed; and

(e)  Support victims, and the families of victims, of crimes committed by removable aliens.

Sec. 3.  Definitions.  The terms of this order, where applicable, shall have the meaning provided by section 1101 of title 8, United States Code.

Sec. 4.  Enforcement of the Immigration Laws in the Interior of the United States.  In furtherance of the policy described in section 2 of this order, I hereby direct agencies to employ all lawful means to ensure the faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States against all removable aliens.

Sec. 5.  Enforcement Priorities.  In executing faithfully the immigration laws of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall prioritize for removal those aliens described by the Congress in sections 212(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 235, and 237(a)(2) and (4) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 1225, and 1227(a)(2) and (4)), as well as removable aliens who:

(a)  Have been convicted of any criminal offense;

(b)  Have been charged with any criminal offense, where such charge has not been resolved;

(c)  Have committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense;

(d)  Have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter or application before a governmental agency;

(e)  Have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits;

(f)  Are subject to a final order of removal, but who have not complied with their legal obligation to depart the United States; or

(g)  In the judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety or national security.

Sec. 6.  Civil Fines and Penalties.  As soon as practicable, and by no later than one year after the date of this order, the Secretary shall issue guidance and promulgate regulations, where required by law, to ensure the assessment and collection of all fines and penalties that the Secretary is authorized under the law to assess and collect from aliens unlawfully present in the United States and from those who facilitate their presence in the United States.

Sec. 7.  Additional Enforcement and Removal Officers.  The Secretary, through the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, shall, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, take all appropriate action to hire 10,000 additional immigration officers, who shall complete relevant training and be authorized to perform the law enforcement functions described in section 287 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1357).

Sec. 8.  Federal-State Agreements.  It is the policy of the executive branch to empower State and local law enforcement agencies across the country to perform the functions of an immigration officer in the interior of the United States to the maximum extent permitted by law.

(a)  In furtherance of this policy, the Secretary shall immediately take appropriate action to engage with the Governors of the States, as well as local officials, for the purpose of preparing to enter into agreements under section 287(g) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)).

(b)  To the extent permitted by law and with the consent of State or local officials, as appropriate, the Secretary shall take appropriate action, through agreements under section 287(g) of the INA, or otherwise, to authorize State and local law enforcement officials, as the Secretary determines are qualified and appropriate, to perform the functions of immigration officers in relation to the investigation, apprehension, or detention of aliens in the United States under the direction and the supervision of the Secretary.  Such authorization shall be in addition to, rather than in place of, Federal performance of these duties.

(c)  To the extent permitted by law, the Secretary may structure each agreement under section 287(g) of the INA in a manner that provides the most effective model for enforcing Federal immigration laws for that jurisdiction.

Sec. 9.  Sanctuary Jurisdictions.  It is the policy of the executive branch to ensure, to the fullest extent of the law, that a State, or a political subdivision of a State, shall comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373.

(a)  In furtherance of this policy, the Attorney General and the Secretary, in their discretion and to the extent consistent with law, shall ensure that jurisdictions that willfully refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (sanctuary jurisdictions) are not eligible to receive Federal grants, except as deemed necessary for law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary.  The Secretary has the authority to designate, in his discretion and to the extent consistent with law, a jurisdiction as a sanctuary jurisdiction.  The Attorney General shall take appropriate enforcement action against any entity that violates 8 U.S.C. 1373, or which has in effect a statute, policy, or practice that prevents or hinders the enforcement of Federal law.

(b)  To better inform the public regarding the public safety threats associated with sanctuary jurisdictions, the Secretary shall utilize the Declined Detainer Outcome Report or its equivalent and, on a weekly basis, make public a comprehensive list of criminal actions committed by aliens and any jurisdiction that ignored or otherwise failed to honor any detainers with respect to such aliens.

(c)  The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is directed to obtain and provide relevant and responsive information on all Federal grant money that currently is received by any sanctuary jurisdiction.

Sec. 10.  Review of Previous Immigration Actions and Policies.  (a)  The Secretary shall immediately take all appropriate action to terminate the Priority Enforcement Program (PEP) described in the memorandum issued by the Secretary on November 20, 2014, and to reinstitute the immigration program known as “Secure Communities” referenced in that memorandum.

(b)  The Secretary shall review agency regulations, policies, and procedures for consistency with this order and, if required, publish for notice and comment proposed regulations rescinding or revising any regulations inconsistent with this order and shall consider whether to withdraw or modify any inconsistent policies and procedures, as appropriate and consistent with the law.

(c)  To protect our communities and better facilitate the identification, detention, and removal of criminal aliens within constitutional and statutory parameters, the Secretary shall consolidate and revise any applicable forms to more effectively communicate with recipient law enforcement agencies.

Sec. 11.  Department of Justice Prosecutions of Immigration Violators.  The Attorney General and the Secretary shall work together to develop and implement a program that ensures that adequate resources are devoted to the prosecution of criminal immigration offenses in the United States, and to develop cooperative strategies to reduce violent crime and the reach of transnational criminal organizations into the United States.

Sec. 12.  Recalcitrant Countries.  The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State shall cooperate to effectively implement the sanctions provided by section 243(d) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1253(d)), as appropriate.  The Secretary of State shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, ensure that diplomatic efforts and negotiations with foreign states include as a condition precedent the acceptance by those foreign states of their nationals who are subject to removal from the United States.

Sec. 13.  Office for Victims of Crimes Committed by Removable Aliens.  The Secretary shall direct the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to take all appropriate and lawful action to establish within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement an office to provide proactive, timely, adequate, and professional services to victims of crimes committed by removable aliens and the family members of such victims.  This office shall provide quarterly reports studying the effects of the victimization by criminal aliens present in the United States.

Sec. 14.  Privacy Act.  Agencies shall, to the extent consistent with applicable law, ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information.

Sec. 15.  Reporting.  Except as otherwise provided in this order, the Secretary and the Attorney General shall each submit to the President a report on the progress of the directives contained in this order within 90 days of the date of this order and again within 180 days of the date of this order.

Sec. 16.  Transparency.   To promote the transparency and situational awareness of criminal aliens in the United States, the Secretary and the Attorney General are hereby directed to collect relevant data and provide quarterly reports on the following:

(a)  the immigration status of all aliens incarcerated under the supervision of the Federal Bureau of Prisons;

(b)  the immigration status of all aliens incarcerated as Federal pretrial detainees under the supervision of the United States Marshals Service; and

(c)  the immigration status of all convicted aliens incarcerated in State prisons and local detention centers throughout the United States.

Sec. 17.  Personnel Actions.  The Office of Personnel Management shall take appropriate and lawful action to facilitate hiring personnel to implement this order.

Sec. 18.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 25, 2017.

Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/30/2017-02102/enhancing-public-safety-in-the-interior-of-the-united-states

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez July 6, 2026
Sample Applicant Request for Naturalization Under INA § 319(b) Some USCIS field offices may ask the applicant to complete a brief written statement confirming that they understand that they are seeking naturalization under INA § 319(b) . The template is not readily available online. As such, our office is adding it to our website to make it more readily available to future applicants. If prepared in advance, the statement can be signed and presented to the USCIS officer at the interview. Otherwise, the officer may provide a similar form for the applicant to complete, which typically takes only a couple minutes. A sample declaration is provided below:
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez July 5, 2026
Sample Commanding Officer Certification Letter for INA § 319(b) Naturalization The following is a sample certification that may be provided by a Commanding Officer, supervisor, or other authorized official in support of an N-400 Application for Naturalization filed under INA § 319(b) . Because sample letters of this nature are not readily available, we are providing this template as a resource. It is intended to address each of the principal eligibility requirements that USCIS may seek to verify regarding the qualifying government employee's overseas assignment. 
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez July 4, 2026
Sample Certification of Continued Qualifying Government Employment Because future employment assignments and contract renewals cannot always be guaranteed, a USCIS officer may request that the qualifying government employee who is currently stationed abroad, or is scheduled to be stationed abroad, provide a written certification confirming their continued qualifying employment and anticipated overseas assignment. The following is an example of a certification that may be used: 
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez July 3, 2026
Based on our firm's experience handling INA §319(b) naturalization cases over the past decade, this guide is intended to help military families and qualifying U.S. government employees preparing for a naturalization interview at the Fairfax, Virginia (Washington, DC) USCIS Field Office. Although every case is unique and USCIS policies continue to evolve, the information below reflects recurring procedures, documentation requests, and practical recommendations that our office has observed during numerous §319(b) naturalization cases. 1. Why choose INA §319(b) instead of the traditional three-year marriage-based naturalization process? For many military families and qualifying U.S. government employees serving overseas, INA §319(b) offers significant logistical advantages. Unlike the standard three-year marriage-based naturalization process, INA §319(b): Does not require the applicant to satisfy the normal three-year continuous residence requirement. May allow biometrics to be completed outside the United States, depending on USCIS procedures at the time. Is generally processed on an expedited basis compared to standard naturalization filings. Often results in expedited oath ceremony scheduling because applicants typically need to return overseas shortly after naturalization. Another important advantage is location. The Fairfax, Virginia USCIS Field Office is located near Washington, D.C., where the U.S. Department of State operates a same-day emergency passport agency. Since a newly naturalized U.S. citizen must obtain a U.S. passport before traveling internationally as a U.S. citizen, this location can make post-naturalization travel considerably easier. 2. What types of government employment are commonly recognized under INA §319(b)? While eligibility is ultimately determined by USCIS and applicable law, we have commonly seen successful filings involving spouses of: Active Duty U.S. Military members Department of Defense (DoD) civilian employees Department of State (DOS) employees NATO employees serving in qualifying assignments 3. What additional documentation should applicants expect? One of the most common questions we receive is: "What documents should I bring beyond the normal naturalization requirements?" The answer has changed over the years. Some USCIS officers request only the documents necessary to establish eligibility, while others request substantially more supporting evidence. Our recommendation is to prepare for the more comprehensive review. Documentation we commonly recommend includes: Employment and Assignment Documentation DD Form 1278 executed at the time of filing Updated DD Form 1278 executed shortly before the naturalization interview Active Duty orders listing the spouse as accompanying, when applicable DD Form 1614 and DD Form 1617, if applicable Current government or military identification cards for both spouses SOFA documentation, when applicable Recent Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) or civilian pay statement confirming continued qualifying employment Command Certification We recommend obtaining a certification from the Commanding Officer (or appropriate supervisor) confirming: The qualifying government employment remains active. The assignment is expected to continue for at least one year. The applicant is authorized to accompany the government employee overseas. Many commands appreciate having a standardized template, which is why our office provides one separately. Applicant Statements Applicants should also be prepared to provide: A written statement confirming they intend to reside abroad with their government-employed spouse immediately after naturalization. Travel reservations, when available. A signed statement acknowledging they are applying under INA §319(b), remain married to the qualifying government employee, and understand USCIS may request additional documentation before approving the application. Additional Documentation Occasionally Requested Although not always requested, we have also seen USCIS request: Federal income tax returns covering all years of lawful permanent residence or prior U.S. residence DD Form 214 Previous military orders Historical SOFA documentation Prior U.S. visas Previous foreign passports, including biographic pages and visa pages Because documentation requests vary from officer to officer, we recommend bringing more documentation than you expect to need. 4. Will I Become a U.S. Citizen on the Same Day as My Naturalization Interview? Generally, no. After your naturalization interview, your case must complete several post-interview processing steps, including quality assurance review, supervisory approval, oath ceremony scheduling, and advance printing of your Certificate of Naturalization. At the Washington, DC Field Office, USCIS officers often advise applicants to allow one to three business days after the interview before an oath ceremony may be scheduled. While processing times vary, same-day naturalization ceremonies have generally not been conducted at this office since 2025. 5. When Should I Schedule an Expedited U.S. Passport Appointment? Based on prior procedures, applicants historically received an automated email reminder approximately three weeks before their scheduled naturalization interview explaining the passport application process and how to request an appointment with the Washington, DC Passport Agency. In most cases, expedited passport appointments are not available on short notice . Once you are within 14 days of your international departure and have confirmed travel (such as an airline ticket), you may request an expedited passport appointment. We generally recommend scheduling the appointment three to five days after your anticipated naturalization interview , if possible. Complete information regarding eligibility, appointment scheduling, required documentation, fees, office hours, and passport application procedures is available through the U.S. Department of State: https://travel.state.gov/en/passports/apply/get-fast/make-appointment/washington.html 6. Will the USCIS Officer Tell Me Whether My Case Is Approved at the Interview? Current USCIS policy (2026) generally provides that officers: Cannot provide their personal contact information or name. Cannot discuss internal case processing procedures or guarantee the outcome of your application. May inform you whether you successfully passed the English and civics tests. May advise that your case is being recommended for approval ; however, a recommendation is not a final approval, nor does it guarantee immediate processing or scheduling of your oath ceremony. 7. Must My Spouse Attend the Naturalization Interview if They Are the Qualifying Government Employee? Practices vary by USCIS officer. Some officers may request that the qualifying spouse attend the interview, while others may permit only the lawful permanent resident applicant to enter the interview room. When possible, we recommend that both spouses attend the appointment . If the qualifying government employee or service member cannot attend because of official employment obligations, a signed letter explaining their absence is recommended. If the officer has questions regarding the qualifying government employment, military service, or anticipated future employment, those questions are often most easily answered by the government employee or service member directly. Although USCIS officers are federal employees, they may not be familiar with the policies, documentation, and procedures of every federal agency, including the Department of Defense (DOD), Department of State (DOS), military branches, or NATO. Each agency and military branch maintains its own procedures and documentation requirements. 8. How Long Should I Plan to Stay in the Washington, DC Area? We generally recommend planning to remain in the Washington, DC metropolitan area for approximately five business days (one full week) . This provides flexibility should your oath ceremony be scheduled several days after your interview, as well as provide sufficient time for the DOS Passport Office to process the Same-day Passport Application of the new US Citizen. 9. What Is the Best Way to Travel to and Around the Washington, DC Area? For applicants traveling from the U.S. East Coast, air travel or Amtrak are both convenient options. Applicants traveling from the Midwest, West Coast, or overseas will generally find air travel to be the most practical choice. While in the Washington metropolitan area, we strongly recommend using the Washington Metro . It is typically less expensive than rideshare services or taxis and provides convenient transportation throughout the region. The USCIS Washington, DC Field Office is located in Fairfax, Virginia , within walking distance of the Dunn Loring–Merrifield Metro Station on the Orange Line. Metro information is available at: https://www.wmata.com/ 10. Are There Food Options Near the USCIS Field Office? Yes. We strongly recommend eating breakfast, brunch, or lunch before your interview. Interview processing times can vary, and being well-fed can make the experience considerably more comfortable. Several restaurants are located within walking distance of the field office, including: Casual Pint – American cuisine, burgers, sandwiches, and craft beer Jersey Mike's Subs – Sandwiches Grove – Poke bowls District Taco – Mexican cuisine Rasoi Indian – Indian cuisine Kiin Imm Thai – Thai cuisine Japomen Vienna – Japanese cuisine Lastly, Is There a Hotel Within Walking Distance of the USCIS Washington, DC Field Office? Several hotels are available in the nearby Merrifield area. For applicants seeking accommodations within a short walking distance of the field office, we recommend: Courtyard by Marriott Dunn Loring Fairfax 2722 Gallows Road Vienna, VA 22180 https://www.google.com/travel/hotels/s/NoVpgAzJuCqQwUcXA While our office cannot address every individual question or circumstance, we have extensive experience with INA § 319(b) (N-400) naturalization cases and are often able to provide guidance beyond what is typically available. If you have additional questions, we may be able to assist you by telephone or email. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez July 2, 2026
Form DD-1278 is the Certificate of Overseas Assignment to Support an Immigrant's Application to File for US Naturalization under INA 319(b) and INA 319(e). Form DD-1278 must be completed and signed by the commanding officer. The commanding officer certifies that the applicant has: (1) “concurrent travel orders” and (2) is authorized to join their Active Duty Military/Government Employee spouse abroad. The Form DD-1278 can be used for filing scenarios covering a spouse (most common) OR a minor child (in very limited circumstances). Form DD1278 can be signed by black wet-ink or digitally with Adobe. The form is available below for easy locating.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez May 7, 2026
DACA Renewals are delayed in 2026. A renewal 2 years ago took 2 weeks to 2 months to complete. However, now DACA Recipients are seeing delays exceeding 120-days and 150-days. What is likely the cause? Effective December 12, 2025, USCIS updated its biometric policy, limiting photo reuse to 3 years (36 months) for immigration benefits. Now, DACA Holders must have a biometric appointment to update photo, fingerprints, and signature samples. With a new set of fingerprints, a background check SHOULD occur just as quick as 2 years ago. However, the opposite has occurred. Now the background checks are delaying, USCIS officers have double the material needed to timely complete a background check, but more does not always mean best. USCIS systems have been encountering technical complications throughout 2025 and now into 2026 that slows done simple tasks like: - opening a PDF - opening a file - completing a task - creating a USCIS Notice The Biometric Policy started to add extra items into filings, which (when coupled with a USCIS that has had technical issues), has made USCIS Officers work much more slowly and only be able to review/process a reduced amount of cases versus at the rate of workflow from prior to the USCIS Policy Change. What to do in response? USCIS Recommendation is to file DACA renewals within 150-120 days from expiration. To be safe: file at the 150-day mark, AND attend your Biometric appointment timely or attempt to attend right when the Biometric Notice is in hand (as many ASC facilities will happily entertain the biometric appointment early). USCIS does NOT Recommend filing earlier than 150 days. The Note directly from the USCIS Website states: Please note that filing earlier than 150 days before your current DACA expiration date will not result in a faster decision. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez January 30, 2026
The most common request in estate planning is a Simple Will. Someone going to an estate planning attorney, and just wanting what they want. This article will cover the commonly overlooked matters. The best way to approach this subject is with a scenario: Jack is married to Jill, and they have two kids over the age of 18. Jack wants to leave everything to his wife and Jill everything to her husband. Simple! The items that complicate: What is being left? The home Jack and Jill live in Rental Property Retirement accounts, such as an IRA, 401(k), 403(b), HSA, and Pension Bank Accounts Vehicles Stock Portfolios ^ If the above are the items that complicate, what goes easily with a simple will? Keepsakes, Jewerly, Momentos, Cash in hand, assets NOT already set up to transfer automatically, etc. Lets break each item into HOW it complicates: The home Jack and Jill live in Everything depends on who the house is deeded to! Many spouses may acquire the home prior to marrying, having only one spouse on the deed. Alternatively, if one spouse is unemployed at time of home purchase, the working spouse may be the only spouse on the deed. A property deeded to BOTH spouses, JOINT, "with rights of survivorship" is the BEST scenario. A will and probate court is not necessary. Rental Property Rental properties may be in one spouse's name OR the property may be deeded to a business, that is only "owned" by one spouse. The issue, the Will is for a Person, it would not directly affect a rental owned by a business. Retirement accounts, such as an IRA, 401(k), 403(b), HSA, and Pension The accounts are owned "individually," by one spouse or the other. A will and probate court is not necessary BECAUSE each retirement account already has a "Designated Beneficiary." Bank Accounts A bank account might ALREADY transfer at death, if a TOD/POD arrangement was set up, making a Will not necessary. Automatic transfer is more ideal than Slow Transfer in Probate Court. The bank account may also be a JOINT ACCOUNT, making the spouse able to immediately access. Vehicles Always a pain to do anything with the DMV! Stock Portfolios The Stock Portfolio are either owned "individually" or "jointly." A will and probate court is not necessary BECAUSE each Stock Portfolio already has a "Designated Beneficiary." What if the Simple Will says one thing and the asset says another? For instance, a Retirement Account has 1 child as the Beneficiary upon Jack's Death. The Simple Will stated to leave EVERYTHING to Wife, Jill. What happens? the 1 child receives the retirement account as it was created while Jack was alive and takes priority. The Will "activates" later in Probate Court, but the retirement account would already belong to the 1 child. What should I do then? Do a Simple Will, HOWEVER consider a review of all Asset Beneficiary Designations. A Simple Will is not the end-all, be-all solution. It is the weakest of Estate Planning/Probate tools. Apart from Asset Beneficiary Designation, consider alternatives, such as a: Trust, great location for a home, life insurance proceeds, managing retirement accounts for those left befind, etc. Updating the Deed to a home or doing a pour-over will Adjust business holdings, especially those that are income producing What are complications to the Family Structure in the above scenario: If both Spouses pass at the same time, and they leave all items to one child over the other. If one spouse wishes to leave everything to one child versus the other If one spouse wishes to leave everything to the other spouse "for the living spouse's life," then then to one or both children If one spouse adds Siblings into their estate planning, or a sibling's children.  Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez January 26, 2026
This is a common question every tax season for any person that has a pending Immigration Filing that required an I-864 affidavit of support. The question could be posed a number of ways: Should I update my I-864 with new Tax Information? I have a new W-2/1099, should that be reflected in the I-864? I did better financially last year, would it benefit updating the I-864? I changed jobs a few months ago, is now a good time to update the I-864 with new financial information? I filed a new 1040 Tax Return and my AGI is different, is that going to be needed? In a short answer, USCIS and NVC should be updated with any new financial document from a Sponsor, regardless if it is requested by the immigration official or given as unsolicited evidence. Common documents to provide/update between January 1st to April 15th of every year are: For Employees: W-2 1040 Tax Return 6+ months of paystubs, especially the last paystub for the prior year IRS Tax Return Transcript, if available For Contractors: 1099 1040 Tax Return Any Tax Schedules covering profits, losses, and expenses/write offs 6+ months of paystubs, especially the last paystub for the prior year IRS Tax Return Transcript, if available For Self-Employed/Business Owners: 1099 or W-2 1040 Tax Return Any Tax Schedules/Form K covering profits, losses, and expenses/write offs Bookkeeping Records Any Tax Filings from the prior year, possibly quarterly filings or a Tax Extension for the most recent tax year entire prior years worth of income proof, possible the business operating back account statements IRS Tax Return Transcript, if available For Retirees/Veterans/Retire-Early FIRE Individuals: Stock/Real Estate Portfolio Statements 1099 forms Distribution Statements Annual Monthly Rate for the Tax Year VA Disability Statement for the Year SSD Statement for the Year 12 months of Bank Statements Do you need to submit a new I-864? Possibly "No." The more updated evidence provided, that is the main focus as it showcases continued financial stability. An updated I-864 "summarizes" what was the Taxable Income OR Adjusted Gross Income OR Non-taxable Income. Should you update the financial documentation? Yes, whenever possible.  Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez January 23, 2026
On December 2, 2025, USCIS Policy Memorandum (PM-602-0192) titled: Hold and Review of all Pending Asylum Applications and all USCIS Benefit Applications Filed by Aliens from High-Risk Countries, was published. The Policy had three (3) Goals: Place a hold on all Forms I-589 (Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal), Place a hold on pending benefit requests for aliens from countries listed in Presidential Proclamation (PP) 10949 Conduct a comprehensive re-review of approved benefit requests for aliens from countries listed in PP 10949 who entered the United States on or after January 20, 2021. 38 Countries are directly affected by this policy pause, and the list is as follows: Afghanistan Angola Antigua and Barbuda Benin Burma (Myanmar) Burkina Faso Burundi Chad Cuba Cote d'Ivoire Republic of the Congo Dominica Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Gabon The Gambia Haiti Iran Laos Libya Mali Malawi Mauritania Niger Nigeria Sierra Leone Somalia South Sudan Sudan Syria Senegal Tanzania Togo Tonga Venezuela Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe This Policy Memo Directly affects: Form I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status), Form I-90 (Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card (Green Card)), Form N-470 (Application to Preserve Residence for Naturalization Purposes), Form I-751, (Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence), and Form I-131 (Application for Travel Documents, Parole Documents, and Arrival/Departure Records). Additionally, if pausing Green Card-related functions, Naturalization and Citizenship Benefits may also be slightly affected, as they build on lawful permanent residence and Aliens naturalizing in 2026 may have entered after January 20, 2021. This Policy Memo is only "active" for a 90-day period, and set to expire around the end of February. The Memo states: USCIS will prioritize a list for review, interview, re-interview, and referral to ICE and other law enforcement agencies as appropriate, and, in consultation with the Office of Policy and Strategy and the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate, issue operational guidance. The USCIS Policy Memo can be seen here for reference:
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez January 15, 2026
US Immigration Bans have been a common occurance in recent decades. The first fact is that "Bans" change, the list of countries can change quickly. The January 14, 2026 US Immigration Ban changed/or added to the January 1, 2026 US Immigration Ban List. A matter of 2 weeks and the list of countries went from 39 to 75. Now, no one can see the future. The listed countries can be added and removed without prior notice. And, possibly the biggest misnomer, can a country listed on the "Ban List" still immigrate? The answer is: possibly, it depends. The policies change frequently, but if we turn to history, the following were common: exemptions for special classes of immigrants, like spouses of US Citizens and Parents/Children of US Citizens. extra vetting for banned countries, like how the DS-5535 was utilized in 2019 Here are a few examples of past Immigration Bans: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/k-1-fiance-visa/k-1-fiance-visas-are-they-banned-in-2020 https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/summary-of-the-april-23-2020-60-day-immigration-ban-by-proclamation-proclamation-suspending-entry-of-immigrants-who-present-risk-to-the-u-s-labor-market-during-the-economic-recovery-following-the-covi At the writing of this article, details are lacking, exemptions are not explained, and vetting procedures are still being drafted. What we do know is the list of countries being affected for the time being: Afghanistan Albania Algeria Antigua and Barbuda Armenia Azerbaijan Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belize Bhutan Bosnia Brazil Burma Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Colombia Cote d’Ivoire Cuba Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Egypt Eritrea Ethiopia Fiji Gambia Georgia Ghana Grenada Guatemala Guinea Haiti Iran Iraq Jamaica Jordan Kazakhstan Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Lebanon Liberia Libya Macedonia Moldova Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Nepal Nicaragua Nigeria Pakistan Republic of the Congo Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia South Sudan Sudan Syria Tanzania Thailand Togo Tunisia Uganda Uruguay Uzbekistan Yemen Additionally, we know that the Embassies and Consulates have been instructed to STOP processing, interviewing, and approving immigrant visas from the affected countries AT THIS TIME. If you would like assistance in an immigration matter, please contact our office to set up a consultation with our immigration attorney. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.