January 25, 2017 Executive Order: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States (Regarding Sanctuary Cities)

fickeymartinez • February 3, 2017

Sanctuary Cities are being challenged by the Executive Order. See Below:

Executive Order: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States

EXECUTIVE ORDER

– – – – – – –

ENHANCING PUBLIC SAFETY IN THE INTERIOR OF THE
UNITED STATES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), and in order to ensure the public safety of the American people in communities across the United States as well as to ensure that our Nation’s immigration laws are faithfully executed, I hereby declare the policy of the executive branch to be, and order, as follows:

Section 1.  Purpose.  Interior enforcement of our Nation’s immigration laws is critically important to the national security and public safety of the United States.  Many aliens who illegally enter the United States and those who overstay or otherwise violate the terms of their visas present a significant threat to national security and public safety.  This is particularly so for aliens who engage in criminal conduct in the United States.

Sanctuary jurisdictions across the United States willfully violate Federal law in an attempt to shield aliens from removal from the United States.  These jurisdictions have caused immeasurable harm to the American people and to the very fabric of our Republic.

Tens of thousands of removable aliens have been released into communities across the country, solely because their home countries refuse to accept their repatriation.  Many of these aliens are criminals who have served time in our Federal, State, and local jails.  The presence of such individuals in the United States, and the practices of foreign nations that refuse the repatriation of their nationals, are contrary to the national interest.

Although Federal immigration law provides a framework for Federal-State partnerships in enforcing our immigration laws to ensure the removal of aliens who have no right to be in the United States, the Federal Government has failed to discharge this basic sovereign responsibility.  We cannot faithfully execute the immigration laws of the United States if we exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement.  The purpose of this order is to direct executive departments and agencies (agencies) to employ all lawful means to enforce the immigration laws of the United States.

Sec. 2.  Policy.  It is the policy of the executive branch to:

(a)  Ensure the faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States, including the INA, against all removable aliens, consistent with Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution and section 3331 of title 5, United States Code;

(b)  Make use of all available systems and resources to ensure the efficient and faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States;

(c)  Ensure that jurisdictions that fail to comply with applicable Federal law do not receive Federal funds, except as mandated by law;

(d)  Ensure that aliens ordered removed from the United States are promptly removed; and

(e)  Support victims, and the families of victims, of crimes committed by removable aliens.

Sec. 3.  Definitions.  The terms of this order, where applicable, shall have the meaning provided by section 1101 of title 8, United States Code.

Sec. 4.  Enforcement of the Immigration Laws in the Interior of the United States.  In furtherance of the policy described in section 2 of this order, I hereby direct agencies to employ all lawful means to ensure the faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States against all removable aliens.

Sec. 5.  Enforcement Priorities.  In executing faithfully the immigration laws of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall prioritize for removal those aliens described by the Congress in sections 212(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 235, and 237(a)(2) and (4) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 1225, and 1227(a)(2) and (4)), as well as removable aliens who:

(a)  Have been convicted of any criminal offense;

(b)  Have been charged with any criminal offense, where such charge has not been resolved;

(c)  Have committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense;

(d)  Have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter or application before a governmental agency;

(e)  Have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits;

(f)  Are subject to a final order of removal, but who have not complied with their legal obligation to depart the United States; or

(g)  In the judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety or national security.

Sec. 6.  Civil Fines and Penalties.  As soon as practicable, and by no later than one year after the date of this order, the Secretary shall issue guidance and promulgate regulations, where required by law, to ensure the assessment and collection of all fines and penalties that the Secretary is authorized under the law to assess and collect from aliens unlawfully present in the United States and from those who facilitate their presence in the United States.

Sec. 7.  Additional Enforcement and Removal Officers.  The Secretary, through the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, shall, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, take all appropriate action to hire 10,000 additional immigration officers, who shall complete relevant training and be authorized to perform the law enforcement functions described in section 287 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1357).

Sec. 8.  Federal-State Agreements.  It is the policy of the executive branch to empower State and local law enforcement agencies across the country to perform the functions of an immigration officer in the interior of the United States to the maximum extent permitted by law.

(a)  In furtherance of this policy, the Secretary shall immediately take appropriate action to engage with the Governors of the States, as well as local officials, for the purpose of preparing to enter into agreements under section 287(g) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)).

(b)  To the extent permitted by law and with the consent of State or local officials, as appropriate, the Secretary shall take appropriate action, through agreements under section 287(g) of the INA, or otherwise, to authorize State and local law enforcement officials, as the Secretary determines are qualified and appropriate, to perform the functions of immigration officers in relation to the investigation, apprehension, or detention of aliens in the United States under the direction and the supervision of the Secretary.  Such authorization shall be in addition to, rather than in place of, Federal performance of these duties.

(c)  To the extent permitted by law, the Secretary may structure each agreement under section 287(g) of the INA in a manner that provides the most effective model for enforcing Federal immigration laws for that jurisdiction.

Sec. 9.  Sanctuary Jurisdictions.  It is the policy of the executive branch to ensure, to the fullest extent of the law, that a State, or a political subdivision of a State, shall comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373.

(a)  In furtherance of this policy, the Attorney General and the Secretary, in their discretion and to the extent consistent with law, shall ensure that jurisdictions that willfully refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (sanctuary jurisdictions) are not eligible to receive Federal grants, except as deemed necessary for law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary.  The Secretary has the authority to designate, in his discretion and to the extent consistent with law, a jurisdiction as a sanctuary jurisdiction.  The Attorney General shall take appropriate enforcement action against any entity that violates 8 U.S.C. 1373, or which has in effect a statute, policy, or practice that prevents or hinders the enforcement of Federal law.

(b)  To better inform the public regarding the public safety threats associated with sanctuary jurisdictions, the Secretary shall utilize the Declined Detainer Outcome Report or its equivalent and, on a weekly basis, make public a comprehensive list of criminal actions committed by aliens and any jurisdiction that ignored or otherwise failed to honor any detainers with respect to such aliens.

(c)  The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is directed to obtain and provide relevant and responsive information on all Federal grant money that currently is received by any sanctuary jurisdiction.

Sec. 10.  Review of Previous Immigration Actions and Policies.  (a)  The Secretary shall immediately take all appropriate action to terminate the Priority Enforcement Program (PEP) described in the memorandum issued by the Secretary on November 20, 2014, and to reinstitute the immigration program known as “Secure Communities” referenced in that memorandum.

(b)  The Secretary shall review agency regulations, policies, and procedures for consistency with this order and, if required, publish for notice and comment proposed regulations rescinding or revising any regulations inconsistent with this order and shall consider whether to withdraw or modify any inconsistent policies and procedures, as appropriate and consistent with the law.

(c)  To protect our communities and better facilitate the identification, detention, and removal of criminal aliens within constitutional and statutory parameters, the Secretary shall consolidate and revise any applicable forms to more effectively communicate with recipient law enforcement agencies.

Sec. 11.  Department of Justice Prosecutions of Immigration Violators.  The Attorney General and the Secretary shall work together to develop and implement a program that ensures that adequate resources are devoted to the prosecution of criminal immigration offenses in the United States, and to develop cooperative strategies to reduce violent crime and the reach of transnational criminal organizations into the United States.

Sec. 12.  Recalcitrant Countries.  The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State shall cooperate to effectively implement the sanctions provided by section 243(d) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1253(d)), as appropriate.  The Secretary of State shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, ensure that diplomatic efforts and negotiations with foreign states include as a condition precedent the acceptance by those foreign states of their nationals who are subject to removal from the United States.

Sec. 13.  Office for Victims of Crimes Committed by Removable Aliens.  The Secretary shall direct the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to take all appropriate and lawful action to establish within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement an office to provide proactive, timely, adequate, and professional services to victims of crimes committed by removable aliens and the family members of such victims.  This office shall provide quarterly reports studying the effects of the victimization by criminal aliens present in the United States.

Sec. 14.  Privacy Act.  Agencies shall, to the extent consistent with applicable law, ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information.

Sec. 15.  Reporting.  Except as otherwise provided in this order, the Secretary and the Attorney General shall each submit to the President a report on the progress of the directives contained in this order within 90 days of the date of this order and again within 180 days of the date of this order.

Sec. 16.  Transparency.   To promote the transparency and situational awareness of criminal aliens in the United States, the Secretary and the Attorney General are hereby directed to collect relevant data and provide quarterly reports on the following:

(a)  the immigration status of all aliens incarcerated under the supervision of the Federal Bureau of Prisons;

(b)  the immigration status of all aliens incarcerated as Federal pretrial detainees under the supervision of the United States Marshals Service; and

(c)  the immigration status of all convicted aliens incarcerated in State prisons and local detention centers throughout the United States.

Sec. 17.  Personnel Actions.  The Office of Personnel Management shall take appropriate and lawful action to facilitate hiring personnel to implement this order.

Sec. 18.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 25, 2017.

Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/30/2017-02102/enhancing-public-safety-in-the-interior-of-the-united-states

I just want a simple will! (Common Overlooks)

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • January 30, 2026
The most common request in estate planning is a Simple Will. Someone going to an estate planning attorney, and just wanting what they want. This article will cover the commonly overlooked matters. The best way to approach this subject is with a scenario: Jack is married to Jill, and they have two kids over the age of 18. Jack wants to leave everything to his wife and Jill everything to her husband. Simple! The items that complicate: What is being left? The home Jack and Jill live in Rental Property Retirement accounts, such as an IRA, 401(k), 403(b), HSA, and Pension Bank Accounts Vehicles Stock Portfolios ^ If the above are the items that complicate, what goes easily with a simple will? Keepsakes, Jewerly, Momentos, Cash in hand, assets NOT already set up to transfer automatically, etc. Lets break each item into HOW it complicates: The home Jack and Jill live in Everything depends on who the house is deeded to! Many spouses may acquire the home prior to marrying, having only one spouse on the deed. Alternatively, if one spouse is unemployed at time of home purchase, the working spouse may be the only spouse on the deed. A property deeded to BOTH spouses, JOINT, "with rights of survivorship" is the BEST scenario. A will and probate court is not necessary. Rental Property Rental properties may be in one spouse's name OR the property may be deeded to a business, that is only "owned" by one spouse. The issue, the Will is for a Person, it would not directly affect a rental owned by a business. Retirement accounts, such as an IRA, 401(k), 403(b), HSA, and Pension The accounts are owned "individually," by one spouse or the other. A will and probate court is not necessary BECAUSE each retirement account already has a "Designated Beneficiary." Bank Accounts A bank account might ALREADY transfer at death, if a TOD/POD arrangement was set up, making a Will not necessary. Automatic transfer is more ideal than Slow Transfer in Probate Court. The bank account may also be a JOINT ACCOUNT, making the spouse able to immediately access. Vehicles Always a pain to do anything with the DMV! Stock Portfolios The Stock Portfolio are either owned "individually" or "jointly." A will and probate court is not necessary BECAUSE each Stock Portfolio already has a "Designated Beneficiary." What if the Simple Will says one thing and the asset says another? For instance, a Retirement Account has 1 child as the Beneficiary upon Jack's Death. The Simple Will stated to leave EVERYTHING to Wife, Jill. What happens? the 1 child receives the retirement account as it was created while Jack was alive and takes priority. The Will "activates" later in Probate Court, but the retirement account would already belong to the 1 child. What should I do then? Do a Simple Will, HOWEVER consider a review of all Asset Beneficiary Designations. A Simple Will is not the end-all, be-all solution. It is the weakest of Estate Planning/Probate tools. Apart from Asset Beneficiary Designation, consider alternatives, such as a: Trust, great location for a home, life insurance proceeds, managing retirement accounts for those left befind, etc. Updating the Deed to a home or doing a pour-over will Adjust business holdings, especially those that are income producing What are complications to the Family Structure in the above scenario: If both Spouses pass at the same time, and they leave all items to one child over the other. If one spouse wishes to leave everything to one child versus the other If one spouse wishes to leave everything to the other spouse "for the living spouse's life," then then to one or both children If one spouse adds Siblings into their estate planning, or a sibling's children.  Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Should I update my I-864 with new Tax Information at USCIS or the Embassy?

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • January 26, 2026
This is a common question every tax season for any person that has a pending Immigration Filing that required an I-864 affidavit of support. The question could be posed a number of ways: Should I update my I-864 with new Tax Information? I have a new W-2/1099, should that be reflected in the I-864? I did better financially last year, would it benefit updating the I-864? I changed jobs a few months ago, is now a good time to update the I-864 with new financial information? I filed a new 1040 Tax Return and my AGI is different, is that going to be needed? In a short answer, USCIS and NVC should be updated with any new financial document from a Sponsor, regardless if it is requested by the immigration official or given as unsolicited evidence. Common documents to provide/update between January 1st to April 15th of every year are: For Employees: W-2 1040 Tax Return 6+ months of paystubs, especially the last paystub for the prior year IRS Tax Return Transcript, if available For Contractors: 1099 1040 Tax Return Any Tax Schedules covering profits, losses, and expenses/write offs 6+ months of paystubs, especially the last paystub for the prior year IRS Tax Return Transcript, if available For Self-Employed/Business Owners: 1099 or W-2 1040 Tax Return Any Tax Schedules/Form K covering profits, losses, and expenses/write offs Bookkeeping Records Any Tax Filings from the prior year, possibly quarterly filings or a Tax Extension for the most recent tax year entire prior years worth of income proof, possible the business operating back account statements IRS Tax Return Transcript, if available For Retirees/Veterans/Retire-Early FIRE Individuals: Stock/Real Estate Portfolio Statements 1099 forms Distribution Statements Annual Monthly Rate for the Tax Year VA Disability Statement for the Year SSD Statement for the Year 12 months of Bank Statements Do you need to submit a new I-864? Possibly "No." The more updated evidence provided, that is the main focus as it showcases continued financial stability. An updated I-864 "summarizes" what was the Taxable Income OR Adjusted Gross Income OR Non-taxable Income. Should you update the financial documentation? Yes, whenever possible.  Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

December 2, 2025 USCIS Policy Memorandum: Hold/Pause of all Pending USCIS Benefit Applications Filed by Aliens from High-Risk Countries

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • January 23, 2026
On December 2, 2025, USCIS Policy Memorandum (PM-602-0192) titled: Hold and Review of all Pending Asylum Applications and all USCIS Benefit Applications Filed by Aliens from High-Risk Countries, was published. The Policy had three (3) Goals: Place a hold on all Forms I-589 (Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal), Place a hold on pending benefit requests for aliens from countries listed in Presidential Proclamation (PP) 10949 Conduct a comprehensive re-review of approved benefit requests for aliens from countries listed in PP 10949 who entered the United States on or after January 20, 2021. 38 Countries are directly affected by this policy pause, and the list is as follows: Afghanistan Angola Antigua and Barbuda Benin Burma (Myanmar) Burkina Faso Burundi Chad Cuba Cote d'Ivoire Republic of the Congo Dominica Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Gabon The Gambia Haiti Iran Laos Libya Mali Malawi Mauritania Niger Nigeria Sierra Leone Somalia South Sudan Sudan Syria Senegal Tanzania Togo Tonga Venezuela Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe This Policy Memo Directly affects: Form I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status), Form I-90 (Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card (Green Card)), Form N-470 (Application to Preserve Residence for Naturalization Purposes), Form I-751, (Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence), and Form I-131 (Application for Travel Documents, Parole Documents, and Arrival/Departure Records). Additionally, if pausing Green Card-related functions, Naturalization and Citizenship Benefits may also be slightly affected, as they build on lawful permanent residence and Aliens naturalizing in 2026 may have entered after January 20, 2021. This Policy Memo is only "active" for a 90-day period, and set to expire around the end of February. The Memo states: USCIS will prioritize a list for review, interview, re-interview, and referral to ICE and other law enforcement agencies as appropriate, and, in consultation with the Office of Policy and Strategy and the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate, issue operational guidance. The USCIS Policy Memo can be seen here for reference:

2026 US Immigration Ban of 75 Countries

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • January 15, 2026
US Immigration Bans have been a common occurance in recent decades. The first fact is that "Bans" change, the list of countries can change quickly. The January 14, 2026 US Immigration Ban changed/or added to the January 1, 2026 US Immigration Ban List. A matter of 2 weeks and the list of countries went from 39 to 75. Now, no one can see the future. The listed countries can be added and removed without prior notice. And, possibly the biggest misnomer, can a country listed on the "Ban List" still immigrate? The answer is: possibly, it depends. The policies change frequently, but if we turn to history, the following were common: exemptions for special classes of immigrants, like spouses of US Citizens and Parents/Children of US Citizens. extra vetting for banned countries, like how the DS-5535 was utilized in 2019 Here are a few examples of past Immigration Bans: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/k-1-fiance-visa/k-1-fiance-visas-are-they-banned-in-2020 https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/summary-of-the-april-23-2020-60-day-immigration-ban-by-proclamation-proclamation-suspending-entry-of-immigrants-who-present-risk-to-the-u-s-labor-market-during-the-economic-recovery-following-the-covi At the writing of this article, details are lacking, exemptions are not explained, and vetting procedures are still being drafted. What we do know is the list of countries being affected for the time being: Afghanistan Albania Algeria Antigua and Barbuda Armenia Azerbaijan Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belize Bhutan Bosnia Brazil Burma Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Colombia Cote d’Ivoire Cuba Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Egypt Eritrea Ethiopia Fiji Gambia Georgia Ghana Grenada Guatemala Guinea Haiti Iran Iraq Jamaica Jordan Kazakhstan Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Lebanon Liberia Libya Macedonia Moldova Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Nepal Nicaragua Nigeria Pakistan Republic of the Congo Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia South Sudan Sudan Syria Tanzania Thailand Togo Tunisia Uganda Uruguay Uzbekistan Yemen Additionally, we know that the Embassies and Consulates have been instructed to STOP processing, interviewing, and approving immigrant visas from the affected countries AT THIS TIME. If you would like assistance in an immigration matter, please contact our office to set up a consultation with our immigration attorney. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Why US Citizens SHOULD do a Utah Virtual Marriage when marrying and immigrating a Philippine Spouse

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • December 4, 2025
Time! That is the short answer. The US Citizen will save time. Lets find the starting line of this topic. A US Citizen meets a filipina or filipino. They fall madly in love. Beautiful! The US Citizen will eventually come to the realization that a PLAN needs to be created. If the US Citizen wants the future spouse to immigrate to the US, plan, plan, plan. The most important part of any plan is the time element. Marrying takes time. In the US, we get a marriage license today, and can marry today. Think of the Las Vegas Marriages we always hear about, or what many call eloping. This is NOT the case abroad. Many countries require the US embassy to give foreign permission of a US Citizen to marry abroad. Lets be specific to the Philippines. In the Philippines, you need time, and time INSIDE of the Philippines. Imagine flying over 24 hours to the Philippines and having to tackle all of the following: Finally getting to hold your Fiancee/Girlfriend (Fun Item) You get to eat some more of the good Filipino Food (Fun Item) Your Fiancee (you might go too or they acquire PRIOR to your arrival) goes the PSA to get their CENOMAR, certificate of no marriage (Not Fun Item) You, the US Citizen, must go to an appointment (2 weeks advance planning needed) at the US Embassy or Consulate for something similar to the CENOMAR (Not Fun Item) Both Fiances, now you apply for the Marriage License, NOT the license yet, just the application to get the license. [Philippine law requires a ten-day waiting period from the filing of the application to the issuance of the marriage license. These ten (10) days are business days, not counting weekends or holidays.] Marriage License is finally in hand 2-3 weeks later Then, you are finally married. US Citizens usually require a minimum of 4-6 weeks IN THE PHILIPPINES, in order to tackle all of the Philippine Requirements. TIMING, lets return to that topic. Most US Citizens considering marrying in the Philippines, will plan or push off a marriage for months or 1-2 years. A 1-2 month trip abroad is a BIG commitment. Takes a lot of planning. Financially, costs a lot. - Now, to the topic at hand, Utah Virtual Marriage Option allows the US Citizen to marry almost instantly. You can marry while you are abroad in the Philippines or another country. The US Citizen can even marry while still in the US, and then fly to see their new spouse and go on a honeymoon. Timing is in the US Citizen's favor. The PLAN can be more focused on the relationship, having fun, enjoying the Philippines, versus running around to government buildings to slowly become married. Now, What is the Catch? There are 4 catches. First, for US Immigration purposes, USCIS REQUIRES after 2024/2025 the spouses to meet in person after marrying virtually and before filing the I-130. Now, if both spouses are in the Philippines during the virtual marriage, which we HIGHLY RECOMMEND, the in-person meeting is easily met. Why do we highly recommend marrying virtually while in the same country? Because it means more to the spouses, to family, and when the officiant says: You may now kiss the bride, you really want to be in person for the once-in-a-lifetime moment. Now, you can marry while separated, but before you start any I-130 filing, you MUST MUST MUST go meet in person first. Second, PLAN a renewal of vows, either back in the US or in your desired church. It is not a mandatory item, but a formality that is appreciated by friends and family. Third, REGISTER THE MARRIAGE! The process is seen here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/utah-virtual-marriage-and-the-philippines-psa-the-report-of-marriage-rom-process Fourth, consider changing the wife's name to the married name shortly after marriage. Don't wait for a few days before or after the visa interview. If the Philippine passport is updated to the married name, then the Immigration visa/Green Card will be updated to the married name. Consider reviewing our other popular Philippine Article: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/consular-processing/us-citizens-guide-to-marrying-in-the-philippines-and-immigrating-a-philippine-filipina-spouse-to-the-united-states  Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Subject/Field Code Discussion for J1s subject to the 212(e) Special Skills List / 2-year Home Residency Requirement: Jamaica Focus

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • November 14, 2025
The J1 Visa is an amazing cultural exchange visa for foreign professionals seeking to acquire US Experience within their profession. Many J1 professionals may find themselves SUBJECT to the INA 212(e) Special Skills List. This article will display the Subject/Field Codes that are SUBJECT for any J1 that is a Jamaican Citizen.

US Citizenship Acquired AT BIRTH from a Father: A Brief Discussion

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • November 13, 2025
US Citizenship can be derived in a child from a US Citizen Father. The process of a father giving US Citizenship to a child comes in a few different ways. The main determining factor is whether the Father was married to the Mother at time of birth or not? Wedlock and Out-of-Wedlock Distinction: Whether a father is married or unmarried determines the ultimate requirements on whether a child derives US Citizenship from a Father. Unmarried/Our-of-Wedlock Requirements: More requirements exist for births that occur outside of a marriage. The US Government would require to see for births on/after 11/15/71: Child/father blood relationship established by clear and convincing evidence; Father must have been a U.S. citizen at the time of child’s birth; Father, unless deceased, must provide written statement under oath that he will provide financial support for child until s/he reaches 18; While child is under age 18, child must be legitimated under law of child’s residence or domicile, or father must acknowledge paternity in writing under oath, or paternity established by competent court. US Residence Requirement: Both parents are US citizens : One had resided in the U.S. or its outlying possessions for any period of time. One US citizen and one US national parent : Citizen had been physically present in U.S. or its outlying possessions for continuous period of 1 year. One Parent is a US citizen, one parent is a noncitizen parent : had been physically present in U.S. or its outlying possessions 5 years, at least 2 of which were after age 14. Married/In-Wedlock Requirements: Less requirements exist for births that occur inside of a marriage. The US Government would require to see for births on/after 11/14/1986: US Residence Requirement: Both parents are US citizens : One had resided in the U.S. or its outlying possessions for any period of time. One US citizen and one US national parent : Citizen had been physically present in U.S. or its outlying possessions for continuous period of 1 year. One Parent is a US citizen, one parent is a noncitizen parent : had been physically present in U.S. or its outlying possessions 5 years, at least 2 of which were after age 14. Why does marriage matter? A marriage legitimizes the birth of a child abroad. Legitimation is a legal concept that exists in the US and is a common concept that exists in foreign countries. The child tends to be the product OF THE MARRIAGE (when the parents are married to one another) versus being from random people or by people in a relationship that haven't reached the level of marriage. What Form or Forms utilize this information? Both the USCIS and DOS utilize the above information. For USCIS, it is processed in the N-600 filing and for DOS it is in the CRBA/Consular Report of Birth Abroad.  Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

NC Court Records for Immigration Purposes: Usefulness of ECourts

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • November 13, 2025
As of October 13, 2025, all 100 NC Counties have been placed in the ECourts System making online access to court records and services more efficient. Integration phases: From February 13, 2023 to October 13, 2025, NC Counties were converted to an online platform. The following map can help show how portions of the state completed the conversion.

Initial DACA Application in 2025: Requirements Summarized

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • October 2, 2025
Although DACA is currently wrapped up in litigation in 2025, there always remains the possibility the the filing category may return in 2025. Here is a summary of the eligibility requirements and required documents. DACA Eligibility: To be eligible for DACA, an applicant must: Be born on or after June 16, 1981 ( be under 31 years old as of June 15, 2012 if what the law says) have continuously reside in the United States since June 15, 2007 , no leaving the US after that date have entered the United States before the age of 16 have graduated from high school in the United States or have a GED Diploma, or be in school for either have NOT been: charged, pled guilty to, been punished for, entered into deferred prosecution, been fined, or been convicted of: a felony (not an exhaustive list): murder/manslaughter robbery (with or without a dangerous weapon) assault with a Deadly Weapon rape and other sex offenses kidnapping arson felony child abuse attempted (any of the above) burglary breaking and Entering larceny embezzlement forgery perjury obstruction of justice identity theft fraud obtaining property by false pretense credit card fraud possession of a firearm certain misdemeanors, such as (examples): domestic violence female strangulation interfering with emergency communication assault (possible) battery (possible) sexual abuse or exploitation indecent liberties with a minor burglary theft (possible) worthless check (possible) unlawful possession or use of a firearm drug possession drug paraphernalia drug distribution or trafficking reckless driving no operators license (possible) driving under the influence; or three or more of ANY misdemeanors. Necessary Documentation: passport-style photo Proof of initial arrival before age 16 and documentation of continuous presence from June 15, 2007 to the present: foreign passport with entry stamps I-94 US Visas or border crossing card birth certificate of applicant medical records vaccination records school records religious records, like baptism certificate school ID tax filings (every year) DMV records social security records birth certificates of US children Proof of education: high school diploma GED proof of enrollment Evidence of identity: Consular ID Cedula or Matricula Card Foreign Driver's License U.S. government document marriage certificate(s) Divorce certificate(s) Annulments of any past marriages Death certificate(s) of past spouses Certified criminal records: any court records, even if dismissed or expunged any police records any traffic records any prison records FBI background check Local court record check Copy of any previous USCIS or Immigration filing. FOIA may be necessary. If you require assistance with the DACA process, please consider contacting our office to set up a consultation with our Immigration Attorney. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Utah Virtual Marriage and the Philippines PSA: The Report of Marriage (ROM) process

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez • September 17, 2025
The ROM/Registry of Marriage in the Philippines for a Utah Virtual Marriage is processed by the Philippine Consulate in San Francisco California. This article will summarize the process, to hopefully make it more easily located on the internet, as many are confused, they see incorrect information online, or believe the virtual marriage is not valid in the Philippines. First, the Consulate's Website should be the FIRST STOP in this registration process. The website link can be found here: https://pcgsanfrancisco.org/civil-registry/ Second, Review the Registration form closely. IT MUST BE TYPED. DO NOT HANDWRITE. Link here: