Blog Layout
January 25, 2017 Executive Order: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States (Regarding Sanctuary Cities)
fickeymartinez • Feb 03, 2017
Practice Areas
Associations
Sanctuary Cities are being challenged by the Executive Order. See Below:
Executive Order: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States
EXECUTIVE ORDER
– – – – – – –
ENHANCING PUBLIC SAFETY IN THE INTERIOR OF THE
UNITED STATES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), and in order to ensure the public safety of the American people in communities across the United States as well as to ensure that our Nation’s immigration laws are faithfully executed, I hereby declare the policy of the executive branch to be, and order, as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. Interior enforcement of our Nation’s immigration laws is critically important to the national security and public safety of the United States. Many aliens who illegally enter the United States and those who overstay or otherwise violate the terms of their visas present a significant threat to national security and public safety. This is particularly so for aliens who engage in criminal conduct in the United States.
Sanctuary jurisdictions across the United States willfully violate Federal law in an attempt to shield aliens from removal from the United States. These jurisdictions have caused immeasurable harm to the American people and to the very fabric of our Republic.
Tens of thousands of removable aliens have been released into communities across the country, solely because their home countries refuse to accept their repatriation. Many of these aliens are criminals who have served time in our Federal, State, and local jails. The presence of such individuals in the United States, and the practices of foreign nations that refuse the repatriation of their nationals, are contrary to the national interest.
Although Federal immigration law provides a framework for Federal-State partnerships in enforcing our immigration laws to ensure the removal of aliens who have no right to be in the United States, the Federal Government has failed to discharge this basic sovereign responsibility. We cannot faithfully execute the immigration laws of the United States if we exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement. The purpose of this order is to direct executive departments and agencies (agencies) to employ all lawful means to enforce the immigration laws of the United States.
Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the executive branch to:
(a) Ensure the faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States, including the INA, against all removable aliens, consistent with Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution and section 3331 of title 5, United States Code;
(b) Make use of all available systems and resources to ensure the efficient and faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States;
(c) Ensure that jurisdictions that fail to comply with applicable Federal law do not receive Federal funds, except as mandated by law;
(d) Ensure that aliens ordered removed from the United States are promptly removed; and
(e) Support victims, and the families of victims, of crimes committed by removable aliens.
Sec. 3. Definitions. The terms of this order, where applicable, shall have the meaning provided by section 1101 of title 8, United States Code.
Sec. 4. Enforcement of the Immigration Laws in the Interior of the United States. In furtherance of the policy described in section 2 of this order, I hereby direct agencies to employ all lawful means to ensure the faithful execution of the immigration laws of the United States against all removable aliens.
Sec. 5. Enforcement Priorities. In executing faithfully the immigration laws of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall prioritize for removal those aliens described by the Congress in sections 212(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 235, and 237(a)(2) and (4) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 1225, and 1227(a)(2) and (4)), as well as removable aliens who:
(a) Have been convicted of any criminal offense;
(b) Have been charged with any criminal offense, where such charge has not been resolved;
(c) Have committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense;
(d) Have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter or application before a governmental agency;
(e) Have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits;
(f) Are subject to a final order of removal, but who have not complied with their legal obligation to depart the United States; or
(g) In the judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety or national security.
Sec. 6. Civil Fines and Penalties. As soon as practicable, and by no later than one year after the date of this order, the Secretary shall issue guidance and promulgate regulations, where required by law, to ensure the assessment and collection of all fines and penalties that the Secretary is authorized under the law to assess and collect from aliens unlawfully present in the United States and from those who facilitate their presence in the United States.
Sec. 7. Additional Enforcement and Removal Officers. The Secretary, through the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, shall, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, take all appropriate action to hire 10,000 additional immigration officers, who shall complete relevant training and be authorized to perform the law enforcement functions described in section 287 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1357).
Sec. 8. Federal-State Agreements. It is the policy of the executive branch to empower State and local law enforcement agencies across the country to perform the functions of an immigration officer in the interior of the United States to the maximum extent permitted by law.
(a) In furtherance of this policy, the Secretary shall immediately take appropriate action to engage with the Governors of the States, as well as local officials, for the purpose of preparing to enter into agreements under section 287(g) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1357(g)).
(b) To the extent permitted by law and with the consent of State or local officials, as appropriate, the Secretary shall take appropriate action, through agreements under section 287(g) of the INA, or otherwise, to authorize State and local law enforcement officials, as the Secretary determines are qualified and appropriate, to perform the functions of immigration officers in relation to the investigation, apprehension, or detention of aliens in the United States under the direction and the supervision of the Secretary. Such authorization shall be in addition to, rather than in place of, Federal performance of these duties.
(c) To the extent permitted by law, the Secretary may structure each agreement under section 287(g) of the INA in a manner that provides the most effective model for enforcing Federal immigration laws for that jurisdiction.
Sec. 9. Sanctuary Jurisdictions. It is the policy of the executive branch to ensure, to the fullest extent of the law, that a State, or a political subdivision of a State, shall comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373.
(a) In furtherance of this policy, the Attorney General and the Secretary, in their discretion and to the extent consistent with law, shall ensure that jurisdictions that willfully refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (sanctuary jurisdictions) are not eligible to receive Federal grants, except as deemed necessary for law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary. The Secretary has the authority to designate, in his discretion and to the extent consistent with law, a jurisdiction as a sanctuary jurisdiction. The Attorney General shall take appropriate enforcement action against any entity that violates 8 U.S.C. 1373, or which has in effect a statute, policy, or practice that prevents or hinders the enforcement of Federal law.
(b) To better inform the public regarding the public safety threats associated with sanctuary jurisdictions, the Secretary shall utilize the Declined Detainer Outcome Report or its equivalent and, on a weekly basis, make public a comprehensive list of criminal actions committed by aliens and any jurisdiction that ignored or otherwise failed to honor any detainers with respect to such aliens.
(c) The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is directed to obtain and provide relevant and responsive information on all Federal grant money that currently is received by any sanctuary jurisdiction.
Sec. 10. Review of Previous Immigration Actions and Policies. (a) The Secretary shall immediately take all appropriate action to terminate the Priority Enforcement Program (PEP) described in the memorandum issued by the Secretary on November 20, 2014, and to reinstitute the immigration program known as “Secure Communities” referenced in that memorandum.
(b) The Secretary shall review agency regulations, policies, and procedures for consistency with this order and, if required, publish for notice and comment proposed regulations rescinding or revising any regulations inconsistent with this order and shall consider whether to withdraw or modify any inconsistent policies and procedures, as appropriate and consistent with the law.
(c) To protect our communities and better facilitate the identification, detention, and removal of criminal aliens within constitutional and statutory parameters, the Secretary shall consolidate and revise any applicable forms to more effectively communicate with recipient law enforcement agencies.
Sec. 11. Department of Justice Prosecutions of Immigration Violators. The Attorney General and the Secretary shall work together to develop and implement a program that ensures that adequate resources are devoted to the prosecution of criminal immigration offenses in the United States, and to develop cooperative strategies to reduce violent crime and the reach of transnational criminal organizations into the United States.
Sec. 12. Recalcitrant Countries. The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State shall cooperate to effectively implement the sanctions provided by section 243(d) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1253(d)), as appropriate. The Secretary of State shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, ensure that diplomatic efforts and negotiations with foreign states include as a condition precedent the acceptance by those foreign states of their nationals who are subject to removal from the United States.
Sec. 13. Office for Victims of Crimes Committed by Removable Aliens. The Secretary shall direct the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to take all appropriate and lawful action to establish within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement an office to provide proactive, timely, adequate, and professional services to victims of crimes committed by removable aliens and the family members of such victims. This office shall provide quarterly reports studying the effects of the victimization by criminal aliens present in the United States.
Sec. 14. Privacy Act. Agencies shall, to the extent consistent with applicable law, ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information.
Sec. 15. Reporting. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the Secretary and the Attorney General shall each submit to the President a report on the progress of the directives contained in this order within 90 days of the date of this order and again within 180 days of the date of this order.
Sec. 16. Transparency. To promote the transparency and situational awareness of criminal aliens in the United States, the Secretary and the Attorney General are hereby directed to collect relevant data and provide quarterly reports on the following:
(a) the immigration status of all aliens incarcerated under the supervision of the Federal Bureau of Prisons;
(b) the immigration status of all aliens incarcerated as Federal pretrial detainees under the supervision of the United States Marshals Service; and
(c) the immigration status of all convicted aliens incarcerated in State prisons and local detention centers throughout the United States.
Sec. 17. Personnel Actions. The Office of Personnel Management shall take appropriate and lawful action to facilitate hiring personnel to implement this order.
Sec. 18. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 25, 2017.
My DS-2019 is blank! How Do I know If I am Subject to the J1 212e 2-Year Home Residency Requirement?
Many J1 Professionals rely on the DS-2019 for determining whether they are subject to the 2-year home residency requirement. However, the DS-2019 can be incorrect or INCOMPLETE. This post will specifically target the common Blank DS-2019 questions/issues. Many look at their MOST RECENT DS-2019 (applicable for the professionals that have received 2-5 DS-2019s, and almost 99% of the time, the "Preliminary Endorsement of Consular or Immigration officer regarding section 212(e)" section is blank . This section, near the bottom left side, has two options: Not subject to the two-year residence requirement Subject to two-year residence requirement For many, when they see that it is blank, they assume that they ARE NOT SUBJECT. However, that would be a mistake. The best indicators are: The FIRST DS-2019, as that is almost always completed and provided to the J1 for Visa Processing overseas The J1 Visa annotates whether subject or not Common DS-2019 ERROR Scenarios The J1 lost/misplaced the prior DS-2019, but would rely on the DS-2019 Extension because it covers the same time period. This is a bad assumption as many subsequent DS-2019s would update the "start date" and the "end date." The "Start Date" is usually updated to the date of Entry into the US versus the first possible date you could have entered for purposes of acquiring the J1 Visa sooner. The J2 DS-2019s NEVER stated subject. So, the J1 must also match them right? No, never assume the dependents status, annotations, or DS-2019 reflect correct information for the J1. The J2 DS-2019s NEVER stated subject, but the J1 is/was subject. This is a common error. If the J1 Professional is/was subject, the J2 100% MUST also be subject. The DS-2019 and J1 Visa state "NOT SUBJECT," but you know another J1 from the same country, same profession, same J1 Sponsoring Agency, and same Subject/Field Code. Errors happen, and "assuming you slipped through the cracks" can be costly. So, how can I be certain in determining whether I am Subject or Not Subject? An Advisory Opinion from the DOS Waiver Review Division is 100% reliable. If that division states you are Subject, then you are Subject. If they state that you are NOT Subject, then you are now and will always be NOT Subject. The Advisory Opinion is a FREE process, it does not "constitute a waiver" (as some J1 Visa Holders are afraid to violate the terms of their employment contract), and it processes in about 1-2 months. How can an Immigration Attorney Help? An Attorney can assist with the Advisory Opinion as that is a service our office provides and an estimate can be found on our J1 Waiver Page ; however, an Attorney can also explain: Timelines Document Requirements Feasibility of a future plan End Goal of either an employment visa or immigration with a Green Card Related Blog Posts: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/when-should-a-j1-j2-perform-a-dos-advisory-opinion https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/can-i-apply-for-a-j1-waiver-simultaneously-with-my-green-card-filing Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
This Blog Post will cover the topic that receives "mixed reviews" from J1 Physicians: the CONRAD 30 WAIVER PROGRAM. A Physician that has the J1 2-year Home Residency Requirement (aka Restriction) has generally heard about this waiver option. Some Physicians like the program because progresses their career and keeps them in the United States, which can pay higher or have better benefits that abroad. However, other may dislike it because: Rural Living/Placement Lower Pay from current area of employment Less opportunities for J2 Family Members The State they DO WANT TO LIVE IN has already capped out the CONRAD 30 Positions Now, CONRAD 30 is an option, and the reality is: IT IS AN UNDERUSED OPTION. Common medical professionals, such as (not an exhaustive list): Anesthesiologist Cardiologist Family physician Gastroenterologist Neurologist Obstetrician/gynecologist (OBGYNs) Oncologist Pediatrician Radiologist Surgeon Urologist May want to reconsider this J1 Waiver Option. The CONRAD 30 does have three (3) main requirements, which give the most concern to Physicians: MUST acquire a NO OBJECTION STATEMENT from their home country (this is something our office has assisted with for nearly a decade), BUT doctors are a prized commodity and the foreign government may really really really want you to return. MUST sign a contract and MUST thereafter complete 3 years under the H-1B Program from the Health Department or Rural Placement. MUST complete the other CONRAD 30 Program Requirements. The Numbers: The Term/Title: UNDERUSED, that was not an exaggeration or play on words. Statistically, of the 1500 Conrad 30 Positions available every year, only 880 to 1167 (statistics taken over a 5 year period). CONRAD 30 is generally unable to place 1/3 of its available positions with Physicians. ( Source ) As an Immigration Law Firm that assists many types of J1 Professionals, I would recommend looking at the less "frequented" states. Colorado , a beautiful state with nearly 6 million people ALMOST NEVER FILLS THEIR CONRAD 30 POSITIONS. If I was a J1 Physician, and I was heavily considering this J1 Waiver, I would go to a place where there is no competition, like Colorado . (Opinion of an immigration attorney). Here is a link to help guide you . In reality, 1/3 of the positions are available/unused. If a J1 physician needs a waiver, maybe consider looking outside of your geographical area because opportunities are available, if you look elsewhere. If you have questions or need assistance with the No objection Statement, please schedule a consultation with our immigration attorney. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
This blog post will cover the two main waiver types common for J1 Public School Teachers: No Objection Statement (NOS) and Exceptional Hardship. What many don't know are the actual statistics for J1 Visa Holders. Some might look at the below DOS Waiver Review Statistics, and think, I have a GREAT chance for success:
With the USCIS Fee Increases that occurred on April 1, 2024, USCIS Filings will be rejected, refused, returned to unknowing filers. The filings will be returned with a template letter stating template-terms such as: Incorrect Fee Payment Incorrect Form Editions Insufficient Funds The fact of the matter would be that the USCIS Filing is rejected and the new fee would be required. The next question is: what should you do next? Should you look online and pay the new fees? Our office would recommend stepping back and reviewing the entire filing. Eligibility must be confirmed. Supporting documents must be confirmed. Form Editions must be confirmed. These topics will be discussed below. Topic: Eligibility Most (Minor) USCIS Filings are now available online at USCIS.GOV. The online system does a great job at screening eligibility and raising red flags when something is amiss. However, the paper filings do not have the same luxury. Over 550,000 applicants file for the (Major) I-485 Adjustment of Status each year. Over 50k spousal filings, 15k fiance filings, 3k child/step-child filings, and 50k parent filings all pursue Adjustment of Status through the USCIS Agency. These filings are riddled with RFEs, experience 1-5 years processing times, denials on eligibility for part or all of the filings and supplemental filings, and straight-up confusion. Some of the most common issues affecting eligibility are as follows: US Citizen has a low taxable income affecting sponsorship Immigrant has a visa violation(s) affecting inadmissibility The underlying relationship ends and US Residence ceases A consult with an immigration attorney can help alleviate this concern. Alternatively, our office has some guides to target eligibility: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/can-i-apply-for-a-j1-waiver-simultaneously-with-my-green-card-filing https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/adjustment-of-status/understanding-adjustment-of-status-movements-around-the-nation-raleigh-durham-processing https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/adjustment-of-status/joint-bona-fide-documents-how-to-start-meeting-the-uscis-i-130-evidence-requirement-for-a-marriage https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/va-disability-and-us-immigration https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/i-864-self-employment-and-business-ownership https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/i-864-sponsorship-how-is-ssi-and-ssdi-assessed Topic: Supporting Documents Supporting documents are mandatory with any USCIS Filing. The main documents not normally provided are: valid birth certificates with english translation proof of relationship proof of financials/income/taxes A consult with an immigration attorney can help alleviate this concern. Alternatively, our office has some resources to target eligibility: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/immigration-checklist-what-our-law-office-generally-recommends https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/our-guidance-on-many-frequent-foreign-birth-certificates Topic: Form Editions DO NOT rely on the expiration date on the top right corner of the USCIS Forms. DO NOT! The USCIS Forms almost always state a form is valid for 2 years after creation. However, some forms can update ever 6-12 months. Check the the USCIS Website, regarding the specific form and the edition date information (as it will also state if prior editions are still be accepted). Where do you verify the USCIS Filing Fee? The G-1055 is the main source to verify USCIS Filing Fees. Conclusion If you have addressed the above three topics, you are ready to re-submit. If you receive a second rejection, it is time to probably consult with an immigration attorney. Just know, USCIS Filing Fees, for instance the $2955 for a full AOS Filing, are expensive. If the AOS is ultimately denied, paying the fees a second time will feel more painful. Our office has frequently assisted with filers that have been denied once, twice, three time in the past. If you'd like to schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney, consider our office. We can assist regardless of state you country you reside in. Our office/attorney Biography can be seen here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/team Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Teachers are always in demand. They are needed in the public schools, they are needed in the private and religious schools, and they are needed in Native American schools. J-1 Teachers are highly educated and experienced. However, most J-1s have a 2 year home residency requirement, that prevents them from applying for an H-1B Visa and a Green Card after their J-1 Program expires. A school located on a Native American Land, may be a positive alternative for J-1 Teachers. What is a Native American School? There are 183 Bureau-funded elementary and secondary schools, composed of 53 Bureau of Indian Education schools and and 130 Tribally Controlled Schools. The Schools are located on 64 reservations in 23 states, and serves approximately 46,000 Indian students. Tribally Controlled and Bureau Operated School is a distinction that aids with the J-1 IGA Waiver. What is the benefit of the IGA Waiver? The School that is need of a school teacher is able to assist in the J-1 Waiver as an "Interest Government Agency." The Waiver could allow them to remove the restriction and pursue an H-1B Teacher Visa. The Bureau of Indian Education, as well as possibly the Tribe and Bureau of Indian Affairs. Where can I locate Native American School - Teacher Position Openings? The Bureau of Indian Education posts openings on their website, located here: https://www.bie.edu/current-vacancies If you have questions regarding the J1 Waiver, you can set up a consult with our office. NOTE: Another alternative for J-1 Teachers requiring the waiver may be R-1 Visas for Teachers in Religious Schools. More information found here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/r1-visa-for-school-teachers-at-religious-private-schools-an-alternative-to-the-h-1b-visa Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
An "unacceptable" No Objection Statement from the foreign government or foreign Embassy or Consulate used to be a rare occurrence. In 2024, this issue has been appearing more frequently and by many different countries. The following might be prompts bringing you to this blog post: The DOS Waiver Status states "No Objection (Unacceptable)" The Embassy/Consulate emailed a courtesy letter with incorrect data The Embassy/Consulate emailed a courtesy letter with poor print quality What should I do? The DOS Waiver Review Division would receive the letter and mark it as unacceptable. They would automatically notify the appropriate Embassy or Consulate on the error. The Embassy or Consulate can take a few weeks or months to correct their error. Should I email the Waiver Review Division at 212ewaiver@state.gov ? You can, but responses can take 1-2 months and it would not affect the case as DOS would act immediately on their own and the case status would update as soon as the foreign government corrects their error. If you have questions regarding the J1 Waiver and what to expect next, you can set up a consult with our office. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
An Arranged Marriage is very traditional to India. From the US Perspective, it may have a negative connotation, portrayed as an unusual arrangement, portrayed as a relationship devoid of love, and even a forced marriage. Arranged Marriages can be conducted through parents that are familiar with one another, or through the services of a Matchmaker or Sima Taparia. However, arranging a marriage is also not uncommon in the US. Hometowns commonly have parents know one another, and the children are invited to family gatherings and parties. A simple introduction or exchanging children's contact information can lead to dating and a marriage. The term "arranged marriage" might feel foreign in the US, but a good spouse from a good family is a good practice. A dating period of one month or six months or 1 year might be short for some people. However, love is love, and newly webs also desire to be together. The focus of the US Government is to look for: the spark of love and plans/dreams to be together forever the absence of force or coercion between the spouses This blog post will address how this cultural process, the arranging of marriage, is handled by USCIS and the US Immigration process. Focus 1: Proving the Relationship A relationship is reviewed by USCIS in the I-130 Petition of an Alien Relative. The I-130 process asks for copious amounts of evidence (a deep dive into common marital evidence one can provide can be seen here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/adjustment-of-status/bona-fide-marriage-evidence-how-many-photos-does-uscis-want-with-an-i-130-filing ). However, for arranged marriages, the common documents that should be provided in the filing are: plane tickets to visit one another (physical presence is important) communication records (talking is important) Photos together (smiles and happiness is important) Items like joint bank accounts, deeds together, leases together, bills together, those items are common for boyfriends and girlfriends in the US, but they can create financial stress to a young relationship. Divorce is high in the US for many factors, financial being a high factor. However, in an arranged marriage, the finances are a little removed, allowing the young couple to focus on: personality, hobbies, and dreaming of a future together. There are perks of focusing the spouses' attentions to what really matters. Evidences, such as those that focus on financial documents, are less important if they do not exist. Focus 2: Timeline A young relationship may only be a few weeks or a few months old at time of the arranged marriage and starting the I-130 petition. The I-130 filing does take a few months to over 1 year to process. During this processing, the relationship grows, it blossoms, love becomes deeper, dreams become reality, and a strong relationship forms. New Marital Evidence can be supplemented and added to an I-130 filing to strengthen it before it is ever reviewed by a USCIS Officer. Focus 3: Marriage in India The US Embassy System does provide the following information regarding marriage in India: https://in.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-services/marriage/ As long as the marriage is properly recorded, the US Government generally accepts the marriage certificate for immigration purposes. Breakdown of the CR-1/IR-1 Spousal Immigrant Process: A Spousal Immigrant Visa can take 1 of 2 forms: CR-1 or IR-1. The difference is the length of the marriage at the time of the Visa Interview. For marriages under 2 years, a CR-1 is provided. For marriages over 2 years, an IR-1 is provided. A CR-1 creates a 2-year Conditional Green Card, whereas the IR-1 creates a 10-year unconditional Green Card. For arranged marriages, the CR-1 Visa is more common when the I-130 is started shortly after marriage. However, if the process does take too long, the filing would automatically change to IR-1. What happens after a 2-year Green Card? An I-751 filing occurs, which allows USCIS to confirm the marriage was with love and allows USCIS to issue a 10-year Green Card or US Citizenship. There are three agencies involved in the CR-1/IR-1 process: USCIS NVC DOS (Embassy/Consulate Division) All three agencies serve a purpose and have particular requirements. Most consider the process as a 2-step process, but a better Step-by-Step Process can be seen here: Part 1 – Petition to Recognize the Relationship – Submit the I-130 Electronically Part 2 – Waiting Period – I-130 Pending awaiting a USCIS Officer to review the filing and supporting documents Part 3 – NVC Processing – Visa fees are paid online, DS-260 is completed, and supporting documents are uploaded. Part 4 – Consulate Interview – NVC provides Mumbai Interview day and time, Consulate Account Registered, Medical Performed, Documents Organized, and Interview Attended. Part 5 – Arrive in the US – Pay the Immigrant Fee, Fly to the United States, Apply/Receive US Social Security Card, and Receive a Green Card in the mail within 3 months after entry. The Mumbai Consulate (New Dehli does not issue immigrant visas at this time) provides the following instructions for consular interviews: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/Supplements/Supplements_by_Post/BMB-Mumbai.html Foreign (Indian) Documents requirements can be seen here: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/Visa-Reciprocity-and-Civil-Documents-by-Country/India.html and an overall document checklist from our office can be seen here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/immigration-checklist-what-our-law-office-generally-recommends/ If you would like a consultation for your immigration filing, please contact our office to set up a consultation with our Immigration Attorney. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
This is a simple breakdown of the amount someone pays on their federal income taxes. Math isn't everyone's strong suit, but income and profit need to be understood at a basic level. For starter, when most hear the term "tax bracket," they immediate thing of percentage of taxes they will owe the IRS at the end of the year. Numbers or percentages like the following fill the imagination: 10% 12% 22% 24% 32% 35% 37% If someone earns $100k a year, they fear the 22% tax bracket because that is $22k of $100k. However, simply put, the tax bracket operates is steps or phases. For example, in 2024, a Married Couple that has a household income of $100k, would see the following tax brackets: The first $23,200 would be taxed at 10% (i.e. $2,320) The next $71,100 of income up to $94300 would be taxed at 12% (i.e. $8,532) The next $5,700 (to make $100k) of income up to $201,050 would be taxed at 22% (i.e. $1254) So, the overall federal income tax would be $12, 106 versus the general belief of $22k at 22%. Another example may be helpful, but this time a married couple that that has a household income in 2024 at $250k. The bracket breakdown would be as follows: The first $23,200 would be taxed at 10% (i.e. $2,320) The next $71,100 of income up to $94,300 would be taxed at 12% (i.e. $8,532) The next $106,750 of income up to $201,050 would be taxed at 22% (i.e. $23,485) The next $48,950 (to make $250k) of income up to $383,900 would be taxed at 24% (i.e. $11,748) So, the overall federal income tax would be $46,085 versus the general belief of $60k at 24%. A visual may help understand the bracket layout:
Sometimes, our pets are like our family. They are our best friends, there are always eager to see us, and they are a part of our family since their birth most of the time. The thought may pop into your head: what is going to happen to my beloved pet when I pass? Is a friend or family member going to take care of them? Are they going to go to the pound when I pass and eventually be put down? In NC, this worry is very common and a law was created to support and address this concern: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 36C-4-408 A "Pet Trust," also known as a "Animal Care Trust," allows for the pet owner to set up the means to care for their pet (dog, cat, snake, bird, lizard, fish, turtle, guinea pig, rabbit, chicken, rats, hamster, horse, etc.), throughout the pets lifetime and then whatever remains from the trust, can be directed to someone else or a charity. The first focus on considering a pet trust is: who do you trust to take care of the pet? and, who would you trust with money after you are gone? A close friend or family member are ideal people to appoint for administering the trust funds. The second focus is how much do you want the trust to cover? A Pet Trust can cover all of the following: Daily food for the pet Daycare costs of boarded for the day or during long vacations Groomer fees Dog or obedience school fees Veterinarian fees even, cremation and funeral services In North Carolina, a pet trust can be set up affordably and be set up in many different ways. The most ideal way is the set it up while alive, so you know all of the details on how the pet will be cared for after your passing. How do you get started? Contact an estate attorney to review your assets, liabilities, and overall retirement plan. The estate attorney can explain the process, assist with creating the trust, they may act as your trustee or help in trustee selection, and explain insurance policies and your ultimate goals. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Setting up a trust to take care of your Spouse, Children, and even Grandchildren is quite easy. A Life Insurance Policy is capable of funding a trust when someone passes. A million dollar term life insurance policy may be as low as $100 a month, and a $5 million term life insurance policy can be as low as $300 a month. A common scenario: A husband wants to make sure his wife and child are taken care of, if he was to pass away over the next 20 years. A trust can be created, instructing on how the wife is taken care of, how the children are taken care of, and whether the wife or children receive the remainder of the insurance policy after so many years or after the wife passes away. An insurance trust (aka Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust or ILIT) can be set up today, to be the game plan for tomorrow or sometime within the term of the life insurance policy. Why use insurance to fund the trust? Cost and security. A million dollars or 5 million dollars is extremely difficult to save. Saving thousands of dollars EACH MONTH is not common or possible for most households, and to keep that saving habit for 20 years in order to save millions of dollars, is not feasible for most. If you saved or invested 1k (about 100$ a month) a year at 6% in the stock market or funds, after 20 years, that investment may be around $40k. By comparison, if you have a $1 million life insurance policy paid to the trust, and the insurance payments were $100 a month, if you passed away, the insurance would create that $1 million savings in the trust. The Insurance Premium is possible, the amount is able to be budgeted, and it is generally available for most household income levels. The insurance would create some security. Should I get a new Life Insurance or can I use an old one? There are pros and cons to old insurance. Similarly, there are pros and cons to new insurance. For old insurance policies, the premiums may be lower, but they usually are named to an individual and not initially to a trust. There are some tax considerations when "updating" old policies and directing them to a trust. For new insurance policies that initially name the trust, the tax considerations are reduced, but normally at the cost of higher premiums (as premiums tend to increase the older one is and due to health matters). Should I get Term Life Insurance or Whole Life Insurance? A mixture of both is not a bad thing. A High Term Life Policy would mean more security while you are younger. If you outlive the term life policy (yay living), the Whole Life Policy would still grow and mature. The mixture of both would mean the trust would remain funded. Now, while you are younger, there is an argument for a higher policy. While young, you normally have: Mortgage Payments Car Payments Credit Card Debt Student Loan Debt Medical Bills Tuition for children You may also have: Higher income producing job The money needed to pay the premiums for a Higher Policy are more accessible when younger. Additionally, since debts are generally higher when young, the High Policy may be able to pay off debts and provide a more secure lifestyle for the loved ones. To Note: A Whole Life Policy generally has higher payment premiums. As an example, a $1 million term policy may have a monthly premium of $100, but a $1 million whole life policy may have a premium of $800-$1200. Who pays the Insurance Premiums and Who owns the Policy? The Insurance trust (aka Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust or ILIT) would own the insurance policy, subject to the life of its creator/grantor. Since the trust owns the policy, the trust would have to pay the insurance premiums. The creator/grantor would need to make sure the trust has sufficient capital to pay the premiums. The trust receives money by its creator/grantor gifting the trust the money (essentially filling its wallet with some capital), and the trustee (the person who will help the trust act when you have passed away) would make sure the payments occur annually. How do you get started? Contact an estate attorney to review your assets, liabilities, and overall retirement plan. The estate attorney can explain the process, assist with creating the trust, they may act as your trustee or help in trustee selection, and explain insurance policies and your ultimate goals. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Recent Blog Posts
My DS-2019 is blank! How Do I know If I am Subject to the J1 212e 2-Year Home Residency Requirement?
Many J1 Professionals rely on the DS-2019 for determining whether they are subject to the 2-year home residency requirement. However, the DS-2019 can be incorrect or INCOMPLETE. This post will specifically target the common Blank DS-2019 questions/issues. Many look at their MOST RECENT DS-2019 (applicable for the professionals that have received 2-5 DS-2019s, and almost 99% of the time, the "Preliminary Endorsement of Consular or Immigration officer regarding section 212(e)" section is blank . This section, near the bottom left side, has two options: Not subject to the two-year residence requirement Subject to two-year residence requirement For many, when they see that it is blank, they assume that they ARE NOT SUBJECT. However, that would be a mistake. The best indicators are: The FIRST DS-2019, as that is almost always completed and provided to the J1 for Visa Processing overseas The J1 Visa annotates whether subject or not Common DS-2019 ERROR Scenarios The J1 lost/misplaced the prior DS-2019, but would rely on the DS-2019 Extension because it covers the same time period. This is a bad assumption as many subsequent DS-2019s would update the "start date" and the "end date." The "Start Date" is usually updated to the date of Entry into the US versus the first possible date you could have entered for purposes of acquiring the J1 Visa sooner. The J2 DS-2019s NEVER stated subject. So, the J1 must also match them right? No, never assume the dependents status, annotations, or DS-2019 reflect correct information for the J1. The J2 DS-2019s NEVER stated subject, but the J1 is/was subject. This is a common error. If the J1 Professional is/was subject, the J2 100% MUST also be subject. The DS-2019 and J1 Visa state "NOT SUBJECT," but you know another J1 from the same country, same profession, same J1 Sponsoring Agency, and same Subject/Field Code. Errors happen, and "assuming you slipped through the cracks" can be costly. So, how can I be certain in determining whether I am Subject or Not Subject? An Advisory Opinion from the DOS Waiver Review Division is 100% reliable. If that division states you are Subject, then you are Subject. If they state that you are NOT Subject, then you are now and will always be NOT Subject. The Advisory Opinion is a FREE process, it does not "constitute a waiver" (as some J1 Visa Holders are afraid to violate the terms of their employment contract), and it processes in about 1-2 months. How can an Immigration Attorney Help? An Attorney can assist with the Advisory Opinion as that is a service our office provides and an estimate can be found on our J1 Waiver Page ; however, an Attorney can also explain: Timelines Document Requirements Feasibility of a future plan End Goal of either an employment visa or immigration with a Green Card Related Blog Posts: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/when-should-a-j1-j2-perform-a-dos-advisory-opinion https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/can-i-apply-for-a-j1-waiver-simultaneously-with-my-green-card-filing Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
This Blog Post will cover the topic that receives "mixed reviews" from J1 Physicians: the CONRAD 30 WAIVER PROGRAM. A Physician that has the J1 2-year Home Residency Requirement (aka Restriction) has generally heard about this waiver option. Some Physicians like the program because progresses their career and keeps them in the United States, which can pay higher or have better benefits that abroad. However, other may dislike it because: Rural Living/Placement Lower Pay from current area of employment Less opportunities for J2 Family Members The State they DO WANT TO LIVE IN has already capped out the CONRAD 30 Positions Now, CONRAD 30 is an option, and the reality is: IT IS AN UNDERUSED OPTION. Common medical professionals, such as (not an exhaustive list): Anesthesiologist Cardiologist Family physician Gastroenterologist Neurologist Obstetrician/gynecologist (OBGYNs) Oncologist Pediatrician Radiologist Surgeon Urologist May want to reconsider this J1 Waiver Option. The CONRAD 30 does have three (3) main requirements, which give the most concern to Physicians: MUST acquire a NO OBJECTION STATEMENT from their home country (this is something our office has assisted with for nearly a decade), BUT doctors are a prized commodity and the foreign government may really really really want you to return. MUST sign a contract and MUST thereafter complete 3 years under the H-1B Program from the Health Department or Rural Placement. MUST complete the other CONRAD 30 Program Requirements. The Numbers: The Term/Title: UNDERUSED, that was not an exaggeration or play on words. Statistically, of the 1500 Conrad 30 Positions available every year, only 880 to 1167 (statistics taken over a 5 year period). CONRAD 30 is generally unable to place 1/3 of its available positions with Physicians. ( Source ) As an Immigration Law Firm that assists many types of J1 Professionals, I would recommend looking at the less "frequented" states. Colorado , a beautiful state with nearly 6 million people ALMOST NEVER FILLS THEIR CONRAD 30 POSITIONS. If I was a J1 Physician, and I was heavily considering this J1 Waiver, I would go to a place where there is no competition, like Colorado . (Opinion of an immigration attorney). Here is a link to help guide you . In reality, 1/3 of the positions are available/unused. If a J1 physician needs a waiver, maybe consider looking outside of your geographical area because opportunities are available, if you look elsewhere. If you have questions or need assistance with the No objection Statement, please schedule a consultation with our immigration attorney. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
This blog post will cover the two main waiver types common for J1 Public School Teachers: No Objection Statement (NOS) and Exceptional Hardship. What many don't know are the actual statistics for J1 Visa Holders. Some might look at the below DOS Waiver Review Statistics, and think, I have a GREAT chance for success:
My DS-2019 is blank! How Do I know If I am Subject to the J1 212e 2-Year Home Residency Requirement?
Many J1 Professionals rely on the DS-2019 for determining whether they are subject to the 2-year home residency requirement. However, the DS-2019 can be incorrect or INCOMPLETE. This post will specifically target the common Blank DS-2019 questions/issues. Many look at their MOST RECENT DS-2019 (applicable for the professionals that have received 2-5 DS-2019s, and almost 99% of the time, the "Preliminary Endorsement of Consular or Immigration officer regarding section 212(e)" section is blank . This section, near the bottom left side, has two options: Not subject to the two-year residence requirement Subject to two-year residence requirement For many, when they see that it is blank, they assume that they ARE NOT SUBJECT. However, that would be a mistake. The best indicators are: The FIRST DS-2019, as that is almost always completed and provided to the J1 for Visa Processing overseas The J1 Visa annotates whether subject or not Common DS-2019 ERROR Scenarios The J1 lost/misplaced the prior DS-2019, but would rely on the DS-2019 Extension because it covers the same time period. This is a bad assumption as many subsequent DS-2019s would update the "start date" and the "end date." The "Start Date" is usually updated to the date of Entry into the US versus the first possible date you could have entered for purposes of acquiring the J1 Visa sooner. The J2 DS-2019s NEVER stated subject. So, the J1 must also match them right? No, never assume the dependents status, annotations, or DS-2019 reflect correct information for the J1. The J2 DS-2019s NEVER stated subject, but the J1 is/was subject. This is a common error. If the J1 Professional is/was subject, the J2 100% MUST also be subject. The DS-2019 and J1 Visa state "NOT SUBJECT," but you know another J1 from the same country, same profession, same J1 Sponsoring Agency, and same Subject/Field Code. Errors happen, and "assuming you slipped through the cracks" can be costly. So, how can I be certain in determining whether I am Subject or Not Subject? An Advisory Opinion from the DOS Waiver Review Division is 100% reliable. If that division states you are Subject, then you are Subject. If they state that you are NOT Subject, then you are now and will always be NOT Subject. The Advisory Opinion is a FREE process, it does not "constitute a waiver" (as some J1 Visa Holders are afraid to violate the terms of their employment contract), and it processes in about 1-2 months. How can an Immigration Attorney Help? An Attorney can assist with the Advisory Opinion as that is a service our office provides and an estimate can be found on our J1 Waiver Page ; however, an Attorney can also explain: Timelines Document Requirements Feasibility of a future plan End Goal of either an employment visa or immigration with a Green Card Related Blog Posts: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/when-should-a-j1-j2-perform-a-dos-advisory-opinion https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/can-i-apply-for-a-j1-waiver-simultaneously-with-my-green-card-filing Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
This Blog Post will cover the topic that receives "mixed reviews" from J1 Physicians: the CONRAD 30 WAIVER PROGRAM. A Physician that has the J1 2-year Home Residency Requirement (aka Restriction) has generally heard about this waiver option. Some Physicians like the program because progresses their career and keeps them in the United States, which can pay higher or have better benefits that abroad. However, other may dislike it because: Rural Living/Placement Lower Pay from current area of employment Less opportunities for J2 Family Members The State they DO WANT TO LIVE IN has already capped out the CONRAD 30 Positions Now, CONRAD 30 is an option, and the reality is: IT IS AN UNDERUSED OPTION. Common medical professionals, such as (not an exhaustive list): Anesthesiologist Cardiologist Family physician Gastroenterologist Neurologist Obstetrician/gynecologist (OBGYNs) Oncologist Pediatrician Radiologist Surgeon Urologist May want to reconsider this J1 Waiver Option. The CONRAD 30 does have three (3) main requirements, which give the most concern to Physicians: MUST acquire a NO OBJECTION STATEMENT from their home country (this is something our office has assisted with for nearly a decade), BUT doctors are a prized commodity and the foreign government may really really really want you to return. MUST sign a contract and MUST thereafter complete 3 years under the H-1B Program from the Health Department or Rural Placement. MUST complete the other CONRAD 30 Program Requirements. The Numbers: The Term/Title: UNDERUSED, that was not an exaggeration or play on words. Statistically, of the 1500 Conrad 30 Positions available every year, only 880 to 1167 (statistics taken over a 5 year period). CONRAD 30 is generally unable to place 1/3 of its available positions with Physicians. ( Source ) As an Immigration Law Firm that assists many types of J1 Professionals, I would recommend looking at the less "frequented" states. Colorado , a beautiful state with nearly 6 million people ALMOST NEVER FILLS THEIR CONRAD 30 POSITIONS. If I was a J1 Physician, and I was heavily considering this J1 Waiver, I would go to a place where there is no competition, like Colorado . (Opinion of an immigration attorney). Here is a link to help guide you . In reality, 1/3 of the positions are available/unused. If a J1 physician needs a waiver, maybe consider looking outside of your geographical area because opportunities are available, if you look elsewhere. If you have questions or need assistance with the No objection Statement, please schedule a consultation with our immigration attorney. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
This blog post will cover the two main waiver types common for J1 Public School Teachers: No Objection Statement (NOS) and Exceptional Hardship. What many don't know are the actual statistics for J1 Visa Holders. Some might look at the below DOS Waiver Review Statistics, and think, I have a GREAT chance for success:
With the USCIS Fee Increases that occurred on April 1, 2024, USCIS Filings will be rejected, refused, returned to unknowing filers. The filings will be returned with a template letter stating template-terms such as: Incorrect Fee Payment Incorrect Form Editions Insufficient Funds The fact of the matter would be that the USCIS Filing is rejected and the new fee would be required. The next question is: what should you do next? Should you look online and pay the new fees? Our office would recommend stepping back and reviewing the entire filing. Eligibility must be confirmed. Supporting documents must be confirmed. Form Editions must be confirmed. These topics will be discussed below. Topic: Eligibility Most (Minor) USCIS Filings are now available online at USCIS.GOV. The online system does a great job at screening eligibility and raising red flags when something is amiss. However, the paper filings do not have the same luxury. Over 550,000 applicants file for the (Major) I-485 Adjustment of Status each year. Over 50k spousal filings, 15k fiance filings, 3k child/step-child filings, and 50k parent filings all pursue Adjustment of Status through the USCIS Agency. These filings are riddled with RFEs, experience 1-5 years processing times, denials on eligibility for part or all of the filings and supplemental filings, and straight-up confusion. Some of the most common issues affecting eligibility are as follows: US Citizen has a low taxable income affecting sponsorship Immigrant has a visa violation(s) affecting inadmissibility The underlying relationship ends and US Residence ceases A consult with an immigration attorney can help alleviate this concern. Alternatively, our office has some guides to target eligibility: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/can-i-apply-for-a-j1-waiver-simultaneously-with-my-green-card-filing https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/adjustment-of-status/understanding-adjustment-of-status-movements-around-the-nation-raleigh-durham-processing https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/adjustment-of-status/joint-bona-fide-documents-how-to-start-meeting-the-uscis-i-130-evidence-requirement-for-a-marriage https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/va-disability-and-us-immigration https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/i-864-self-employment-and-business-ownership https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/i-864-sponsorship-how-is-ssi-and-ssdi-assessed Topic: Supporting Documents Supporting documents are mandatory with any USCIS Filing. The main documents not normally provided are: valid birth certificates with english translation proof of relationship proof of financials/income/taxes A consult with an immigration attorney can help alleviate this concern. Alternatively, our office has some resources to target eligibility: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/immigration-checklist-what-our-law-office-generally-recommends https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/our-guidance-on-many-frequent-foreign-birth-certificates Topic: Form Editions DO NOT rely on the expiration date on the top right corner of the USCIS Forms. DO NOT! The USCIS Forms almost always state a form is valid for 2 years after creation. However, some forms can update ever 6-12 months. Check the the USCIS Website, regarding the specific form and the edition date information (as it will also state if prior editions are still be accepted). Where do you verify the USCIS Filing Fee? The G-1055 is the main source to verify USCIS Filing Fees. Conclusion If you have addressed the above three topics, you are ready to re-submit. If you receive a second rejection, it is time to probably consult with an immigration attorney. Just know, USCIS Filing Fees, for instance the $2955 for a full AOS Filing, are expensive. If the AOS is ultimately denied, paying the fees a second time will feel more painful. Our office has frequently assisted with filers that have been denied once, twice, three time in the past. If you'd like to schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney, consider our office. We can assist regardless of state you country you reside in. Our office/attorney Biography can be seen here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/team Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Teachers are always in demand. They are needed in the public schools, they are needed in the private and religious schools, and they are needed in Native American schools. J-1 Teachers are highly educated and experienced. However, most J-1s have a 2 year home residency requirement, that prevents them from applying for an H-1B Visa and a Green Card after their J-1 Program expires. A school located on a Native American Land, may be a positive alternative for J-1 Teachers. What is a Native American School? There are 183 Bureau-funded elementary and secondary schools, composed of 53 Bureau of Indian Education schools and and 130 Tribally Controlled Schools. The Schools are located on 64 reservations in 23 states, and serves approximately 46,000 Indian students. Tribally Controlled and Bureau Operated School is a distinction that aids with the J-1 IGA Waiver. What is the benefit of the IGA Waiver? The School that is need of a school teacher is able to assist in the J-1 Waiver as an "Interest Government Agency." The Waiver could allow them to remove the restriction and pursue an H-1B Teacher Visa. The Bureau of Indian Education, as well as possibly the Tribe and Bureau of Indian Affairs. Where can I locate Native American School - Teacher Position Openings? The Bureau of Indian Education posts openings on their website, located here: https://www.bie.edu/current-vacancies If you have questions regarding the J1 Waiver, you can set up a consult with our office. NOTE: Another alternative for J-1 Teachers requiring the waiver may be R-1 Visas for Teachers in Religious Schools. More information found here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/r1-visa-for-school-teachers-at-religious-private-schools-an-alternative-to-the-h-1b-visa Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
An "unacceptable" No Objection Statement from the foreign government or foreign Embassy or Consulate used to be a rare occurrence. In 2024, this issue has been appearing more frequently and by many different countries. The following might be prompts bringing you to this blog post: The DOS Waiver Status states "No Objection (Unacceptable)" The Embassy/Consulate emailed a courtesy letter with incorrect data The Embassy/Consulate emailed a courtesy letter with poor print quality What should I do? The DOS Waiver Review Division would receive the letter and mark it as unacceptable. They would automatically notify the appropriate Embassy or Consulate on the error. The Embassy or Consulate can take a few weeks or months to correct their error. Should I email the Waiver Review Division at 212ewaiver@state.gov ? You can, but responses can take 1-2 months and it would not affect the case as DOS would act immediately on their own and the case status would update as soon as the foreign government corrects their error. If you have questions regarding the J1 Waiver and what to expect next, you can set up a consult with our office. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
An Arranged Marriage is very traditional to India. From the US Perspective, it may have a negative connotation, portrayed as an unusual arrangement, portrayed as a relationship devoid of love, and even a forced marriage. Arranged Marriages can be conducted through parents that are familiar with one another, or through the services of a Matchmaker or Sima Taparia. However, arranging a marriage is also not uncommon in the US. Hometowns commonly have parents know one another, and the children are invited to family gatherings and parties. A simple introduction or exchanging children's contact information can lead to dating and a marriage. The term "arranged marriage" might feel foreign in the US, but a good spouse from a good family is a good practice. A dating period of one month or six months or 1 year might be short for some people. However, love is love, and newly webs also desire to be together. The focus of the US Government is to look for: the spark of love and plans/dreams to be together forever the absence of force or coercion between the spouses This blog post will address how this cultural process, the arranging of marriage, is handled by USCIS and the US Immigration process. Focus 1: Proving the Relationship A relationship is reviewed by USCIS in the I-130 Petition of an Alien Relative. The I-130 process asks for copious amounts of evidence (a deep dive into common marital evidence one can provide can be seen here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/adjustment-of-status/bona-fide-marriage-evidence-how-many-photos-does-uscis-want-with-an-i-130-filing ). However, for arranged marriages, the common documents that should be provided in the filing are: plane tickets to visit one another (physical presence is important) communication records (talking is important) Photos together (smiles and happiness is important) Items like joint bank accounts, deeds together, leases together, bills together, those items are common for boyfriends and girlfriends in the US, but they can create financial stress to a young relationship. Divorce is high in the US for many factors, financial being a high factor. However, in an arranged marriage, the finances are a little removed, allowing the young couple to focus on: personality, hobbies, and dreaming of a future together. There are perks of focusing the spouses' attentions to what really matters. Evidences, such as those that focus on financial documents, are less important if they do not exist. Focus 2: Timeline A young relationship may only be a few weeks or a few months old at time of the arranged marriage and starting the I-130 petition. The I-130 filing does take a few months to over 1 year to process. During this processing, the relationship grows, it blossoms, love becomes deeper, dreams become reality, and a strong relationship forms. New Marital Evidence can be supplemented and added to an I-130 filing to strengthen it before it is ever reviewed by a USCIS Officer. Focus 3: Marriage in India The US Embassy System does provide the following information regarding marriage in India: https://in.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-services/marriage/ As long as the marriage is properly recorded, the US Government generally accepts the marriage certificate for immigration purposes. Breakdown of the CR-1/IR-1 Spousal Immigrant Process: A Spousal Immigrant Visa can take 1 of 2 forms: CR-1 or IR-1. The difference is the length of the marriage at the time of the Visa Interview. For marriages under 2 years, a CR-1 is provided. For marriages over 2 years, an IR-1 is provided. A CR-1 creates a 2-year Conditional Green Card, whereas the IR-1 creates a 10-year unconditional Green Card. For arranged marriages, the CR-1 Visa is more common when the I-130 is started shortly after marriage. However, if the process does take too long, the filing would automatically change to IR-1. What happens after a 2-year Green Card? An I-751 filing occurs, which allows USCIS to confirm the marriage was with love and allows USCIS to issue a 10-year Green Card or US Citizenship. There are three agencies involved in the CR-1/IR-1 process: USCIS NVC DOS (Embassy/Consulate Division) All three agencies serve a purpose and have particular requirements. Most consider the process as a 2-step process, but a better Step-by-Step Process can be seen here: Part 1 – Petition to Recognize the Relationship – Submit the I-130 Electronically Part 2 – Waiting Period – I-130 Pending awaiting a USCIS Officer to review the filing and supporting documents Part 3 – NVC Processing – Visa fees are paid online, DS-260 is completed, and supporting documents are uploaded. Part 4 – Consulate Interview – NVC provides Mumbai Interview day and time, Consulate Account Registered, Medical Performed, Documents Organized, and Interview Attended. Part 5 – Arrive in the US – Pay the Immigrant Fee, Fly to the United States, Apply/Receive US Social Security Card, and Receive a Green Card in the mail within 3 months after entry. The Mumbai Consulate (New Dehli does not issue immigrant visas at this time) provides the following instructions for consular interviews: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/Supplements/Supplements_by_Post/BMB-Mumbai.html Foreign (Indian) Documents requirements can be seen here: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/Visa-Reciprocity-and-Civil-Documents-by-Country/India.html and an overall document checklist from our office can be seen here: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/immigration/immigration-checklist-what-our-law-office-generally-recommends/ If you would like a consultation for your immigration filing, please contact our office to set up a consultation with our Immigration Attorney. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
This is a simple breakdown of the amount someone pays on their federal income taxes. Math isn't everyone's strong suit, but income and profit need to be understood at a basic level. For starter, when most hear the term "tax bracket," they immediate thing of percentage of taxes they will owe the IRS at the end of the year. Numbers or percentages like the following fill the imagination: 10% 12% 22% 24% 32% 35% 37% If someone earns $100k a year, they fear the 22% tax bracket because that is $22k of $100k. However, simply put, the tax bracket operates is steps or phases. For example, in 2024, a Married Couple that has a household income of $100k, would see the following tax brackets: The first $23,200 would be taxed at 10% (i.e. $2,320) The next $71,100 of income up to $94300 would be taxed at 12% (i.e. $8,532) The next $5,700 (to make $100k) of income up to $201,050 would be taxed at 22% (i.e. $1254) So, the overall federal income tax would be $12, 106 versus the general belief of $22k at 22%. Another example may be helpful, but this time a married couple that that has a household income in 2024 at $250k. The bracket breakdown would be as follows: The first $23,200 would be taxed at 10% (i.e. $2,320) The next $71,100 of income up to $94,300 would be taxed at 12% (i.e. $8,532) The next $106,750 of income up to $201,050 would be taxed at 22% (i.e. $23,485) The next $48,950 (to make $250k) of income up to $383,900 would be taxed at 24% (i.e. $11,748) So, the overall federal income tax would be $46,085 versus the general belief of $60k at 24%. A visual may help understand the bracket layout:
Sometimes, our pets are like our family. They are our best friends, there are always eager to see us, and they are a part of our family since their birth most of the time. The thought may pop into your head: what is going to happen to my beloved pet when I pass? Is a friend or family member going to take care of them? Are they going to go to the pound when I pass and eventually be put down? In NC, this worry is very common and a law was created to support and address this concern: N.C. Gen. Stat. § 36C-4-408 A "Pet Trust," also known as a "Animal Care Trust," allows for the pet owner to set up the means to care for their pet (dog, cat, snake, bird, lizard, fish, turtle, guinea pig, rabbit, chicken, rats, hamster, horse, etc.), throughout the pets lifetime and then whatever remains from the trust, can be directed to someone else or a charity. The first focus on considering a pet trust is: who do you trust to take care of the pet? and, who would you trust with money after you are gone? A close friend or family member are ideal people to appoint for administering the trust funds. The second focus is how much do you want the trust to cover? A Pet Trust can cover all of the following: Daily food for the pet Daycare costs of boarded for the day or during long vacations Groomer fees Dog or obedience school fees Veterinarian fees even, cremation and funeral services In North Carolina, a pet trust can be set up affordably and be set up in many different ways. The most ideal way is the set it up while alive, so you know all of the details on how the pet will be cared for after your passing. How do you get started? Contact an estate attorney to review your assets, liabilities, and overall retirement plan. The estate attorney can explain the process, assist with creating the trust, they may act as your trustee or help in trustee selection, and explain insurance policies and your ultimate goals. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Setting up a trust to take care of your Spouse, Children, and even Grandchildren is quite easy. A Life Insurance Policy is capable of funding a trust when someone passes. A million dollar term life insurance policy may be as low as $100 a month, and a $5 million term life insurance policy can be as low as $300 a month. A common scenario: A husband wants to make sure his wife and child are taken care of, if he was to pass away over the next 20 years. A trust can be created, instructing on how the wife is taken care of, how the children are taken care of, and whether the wife or children receive the remainder of the insurance policy after so many years or after the wife passes away. An insurance trust (aka Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust or ILIT) can be set up today, to be the game plan for tomorrow or sometime within the term of the life insurance policy. Why use insurance to fund the trust? Cost and security. A million dollars or 5 million dollars is extremely difficult to save. Saving thousands of dollars EACH MONTH is not common or possible for most households, and to keep that saving habit for 20 years in order to save millions of dollars, is not feasible for most. If you saved or invested 1k (about 100$ a month) a year at 6% in the stock market or funds, after 20 years, that investment may be around $40k. By comparison, if you have a $1 million life insurance policy paid to the trust, and the insurance payments were $100 a month, if you passed away, the insurance would create that $1 million savings in the trust. The Insurance Premium is possible, the amount is able to be budgeted, and it is generally available for most household income levels. The insurance would create some security. Should I get a new Life Insurance or can I use an old one? There are pros and cons to old insurance. Similarly, there are pros and cons to new insurance. For old insurance policies, the premiums may be lower, but they usually are named to an individual and not initially to a trust. There are some tax considerations when "updating" old policies and directing them to a trust. For new insurance policies that initially name the trust, the tax considerations are reduced, but normally at the cost of higher premiums (as premiums tend to increase the older one is and due to health matters). Should I get Term Life Insurance or Whole Life Insurance? A mixture of both is not a bad thing. A High Term Life Policy would mean more security while you are younger. If you outlive the term life policy (yay living), the Whole Life Policy would still grow and mature. The mixture of both would mean the trust would remain funded. Now, while you are younger, there is an argument for a higher policy. While young, you normally have: Mortgage Payments Car Payments Credit Card Debt Student Loan Debt Medical Bills Tuition for children You may also have: Higher income producing job The money needed to pay the premiums for a Higher Policy are more accessible when younger. Additionally, since debts are generally higher when young, the High Policy may be able to pay off debts and provide a more secure lifestyle for the loved ones. To Note: A Whole Life Policy generally has higher payment premiums. As an example, a $1 million term policy may have a monthly premium of $100, but a $1 million whole life policy may have a premium of $800-$1200. Who pays the Insurance Premiums and Who owns the Policy? The Insurance trust (aka Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust or ILIT) would own the insurance policy, subject to the life of its creator/grantor. Since the trust owns the policy, the trust would have to pay the insurance premiums. The creator/grantor would need to make sure the trust has sufficient capital to pay the premiums. The trust receives money by its creator/grantor gifting the trust the money (essentially filling its wallet with some capital), and the trustee (the person who will help the trust act when you have passed away) would make sure the payments occur annually. How do you get started? Contact an estate attorney to review your assets, liabilities, and overall retirement plan. The estate attorney can explain the process, assist with creating the trust, they may act as your trustee or help in trustee selection, and explain insurance policies and your ultimate goals. Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
DISCLAIMER – The information does not constitute legal advice and please be aware that neither this website nor the use of information from this website creates an attorney-client relationship.
© 2021 Fickey Martinez Law Firm. All Rights Reserved.
This website has been built to be accessible for all users. If you experience any difficulty in accessing this website, please contact us for assistance.
Powered by
