Blog Layout

Can I expedite the I-765 Employment Authorization?

fickeymartinez • Apr 01, 2020

In short, NO, the I-765 Permission to Work is not normally able to be expedited, except in severe and unexpected circumstances. The stand-alone argument that you need to work to pay bills is insufficient. The following is a longer explanation on why such a request cannot normally be expedited.

USCIS Expedite Policy states:

USCIS may consider an expedite request if it meets one or more of the following criteria:

  • Severe financial loss to a company or person, provided that the need for urgent action is not the result of the petitioner’s or applicant’s failure to:
    1. File the benefit request or the expedite request in a reasonable time frame, or
    2. Respond to any requests for additional evidence in a reasonably timely manner;
  • Urgent humanitarian reasons;
  • Compelling U.S. government interests (such as urgent cases for the Department of Defense or DHS, or other public safety or national security interests); or
  • Clear USCIS error.

USCIS Further Explains “Severe Economic Loss”

When considering severe financial loss to a person: If the expedite request relates to an application for employment authorization or student status, the need to obtain employment authorization or student status, standing alone without any evidence of other compelling factors does not warrant expedited treatment.

All expedite requests claiming severe financial loss, regardless of the immigration benefit sought and regardless of whether the claimed loss is to a company or a person, must be documented to establish the loss and that the requestor is not able to withstand the temporary financial loss that is the natural result of normal processing times.

When you tie these two explanations with the above “File the benefit request or the expedite request in a reasonable time frame,” USCIS can always reject an Expedite Request since the Immigrant could have filed sooner or could have married sooner to possible avoid any financial hardship. Even loss of the Immigrant’s legal employment is insufficient to establish “severe financial loss.” Lastly, the “Reasonable Time Frame” in the above criteria is an easy way to summarily deny a request.

Reasons why an I-765 Expedite Request normally fails and possible consequences

USCIS Policy Expedite Policy does have a category for “severe economic loss;” however, every request should consider how it could damage the I-864 and the I-944. USCIS will likely reject an I-765 Expedite Request for a number of reasons, examples below:

  1. The Petitioner of the Family-based Immigration Filing should be financially stable enough to work and support the household, according to the I-864.
  2. The Immigrant ‘s inability to legally work or loss of work are not severe outcomes rising to the level of Economic Hardship since the Immigrant is expected to plan for the normal processing time of the I765 and the Petitioner or Co-Sponsor are financial sponsors. A financial sponsor who cannot provide while an I485 is pending, may not be able to provide once a Green Card is approved. Note: this could disqualify Sponsors and their I864.
  3. The existence of bills and debt in the household is not a ground for a “severe” occurrence since the bills and debt likely already existed prior to a Green Card Filing.
  4. An argument that an Immigrant ‘s ability to work would irreparably damage the finances could cause an issue for the I-944 Self Sufficiency. If irreparably damaged while the Green Card is pending, then the Immigration Bond of $8100 may be required.

I-765 Expedite Request Scenarios

Example 1: An Immigrant is a “key employee” in a company project, such as a researcher or chemist. The Company would lose a million-dollar grant or their stocks would plummet if the project deadline is not met, and the “key employee” would help avoid that outcome. If the Immigrant is legally employed and the employment status (J-1, H-1B, O, etc) is set to expire months after the Family-based I-485 was filed, the employer can provide evidence and a clear statement of the financial loss that may warrant the Expedition of the I-765.

However, a key flaw in this example is that fact that the company could have filed a new visa for the employee, the employer could have taken timely steps to file their own Green Card Filing, the Immigrant could have filed their family-based I-485 sooner avoiding this outcome.

Example 2: An Immigrant has been legally working at a company. The pay was good, the immigrant created a savings account of $20,000. The Immigrant married a US Citizen who was employed at a good job as well. A recession occurred or the employers for both the immigrant and US Citizen Petitioner laid off many people. Now, the couple are unemployed, bills are stacking up, savings is being consumed quickly. The couple feels that the immigrant needs to work immediately and an expedite request of the I-765 would help.

However, a key flaw in this example is that the US Citizen could also work or should be able to work. If the US Citizen could pay the bills or the bills could be reduced to a level where the US Citizen could pay, there is no “severe economic loss” since there would no longer be loss.

Example 3: The Immigrant and US Citizen Spouse were employed. The US Citizen became pregnant (Yay! A Baby!), but the pregnancy was complicated and forced the US Citizen to stay in the hospital for many months. The US Citizen cannot be fired, has health insurance, but does not receive her paycheck. The Immigrant loses their job authorized by a Visa. The couple feels that the immigrant needs to work immediately and an expedite request of the I-765 would help.

Here, the spouses could argue everything was outside of their control. First, the US Citizen would never want a complicated pregnancy. Second, the Immigrant was working legally. Now, no income is coming in, the bills are piling up, and both spouses may be out of work for many months. Bank statements, bill statements, credit reports of both spouses can all be provided with clear statements requesting the I-765 be expedited.

Related Blog Posts:

 

 

Disclaimer:  This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 17 May, 2024
J1 Teachers raise this question frequently. The School Administration or the HR Department does a summary review of the sponsorship visa fees, and then they "condition job offers" to the J1 Teacher to pay their own fees in a few different ways. This article will target the following questions: Can the H-1B Employee pay the H-1B Fees for the Employer? Can the H-1B Employer have the Employee sign a promissory note? Can the H-1B Employer have the Employee take out a loan for their own fees? Can the H-1B Employer have the Employee drop the cashier checks for the Immigration Fees to the Employer? Can the H-1B Employer have the Employee pay the Immigration Attorney? Can the H-1B Employer have the Employee agree to a lower pay to compensate/reimburse the Employer for the H-1B Fees? The answer to each and every question is: NO. The U.S. Department of Labor regulations require that employers pay all expenses necessary for H-1B applications. The fees cannot be recouped from employees . The Regulations can be seen here:
By fickeymartinez 17 May, 2024
The Philippines, a beautiful country with polite people, delicious food, and a positive culture. Marrying someone from the Philippines is wonderful! This article will discuss the two common questions: How does a US Citizen marry in the Philippines? How does the Philippine Spouse immigrate to the US? If you are interested in the US K-1 […] The post US Citizen’s Guide to Marrying in the Philippines and Immigrating a Philippine (Filipina) Spouse to the United States appeared first on Fickey Martinez Law Firm.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 13 May, 2024
[Publicación en español] Finally, the interview is here!!!! The finish line is within arms reach. However, many things need to get done, and be done ASAP. But but but THEY MUST BE DONE IN ORDER. Please don’t focus on something minor, when other matters must be done since time is of the essence. First: LOCATE […] The post Immigrant Visa Interview Scheduled: What to Focus on Now and In What Order appeared first on Fickey Martinez Law Firm.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 13 May, 2024
[Leer Publicación en español] The NVC “Documentarily Qualified Email” is great news, it means progress. Essentially, the NVC states 3 things in the notice: First, the following has been reviewed, approved, and completed: Visa Fee Payments DS-260 Visa Application I-864 Affidavit of Support All Mandatory Petitioner/Sponsor Supporting Documents All Mandatory Beneficiary Supporting Documents The NVC […] The post NVC’s Documentarily Qualified Status/Notice: What Happens Next? appeared first on Fickey Martinez Law Firm.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 10 May, 2024
California brings in many J1 Participants each year under many different types of Cultural Exchange Programs. This post will take a snapshot of 1 fiscal year, 2022-2023. This information may be helpful for J1 Professionals considering placement locations.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 10 May, 2024
Esta publicación cubrirá una de las preguntas más comunes que tiene un J1: ¿la exención J1 permitiría el empleo? En resumen, la respuesta depende de que se exima la visa J1. Un J1 aún puede trabajar durante su Período Autorizado DS-2019, con el mismo empleador y el mismo puesto. Si el Patrocinador NO cancela el Estatus J1 en el Sistema Gubernamental, el empleo aún está autorizado. Por lo tanto, la Exención no detendría el empleo, pero en sí misma no lo permite. Esta es una distinción importante, porque otros podrían ver J1 funcionando y podrían percibir erróneamente la exención que lo autoriza. Si el DS-2019 está por vencer o ya venció, el J1 Waiver NO otorga: autorización de empleo renovación de licencia de conducir viajes internacionales En otras palabras, la Exención J1 NO ES UN ESTADO para permanecer en EE.UU., eso es lo que hace la Visa J1. La Exención, en esencia, es simplemente un proceso para ROMPER un acuerdo previo para regresar al extranjero (país de origen) por un mínimo de dos años. Una vez aprobada la exención, el J1 puede buscar un estatus migratorio diferente, como por ejemplo: Inmigrar a los EE.UU. (adquirir Residencia Permanente Legal o Tarjeta Verde) ya sea a través del proceso de Ajuste de Estatus I-485 o el Proceso Consular DS-260 Visa de prometido K-1 Visa de Empleo H Visa de Empleo L Si trabajan más allá de la Visa J1 y sin autorización de empleo, la mayoría no son elegibles para Visas de Empleo, y las solicitudes de inmigración para la Tarjeta Verde pueden ser prohibidas o consideradas inadmisibles por Fraude I-9. Puede ver más información sobre la exención J1 en nuestro sitio web . Si necesita asistencia de exención J1, no dude en contactarnos. Contacte nuestra oficina para una consulta. Descargo de responsabilidad: El abogado o el editor del bufete de abogados pone a disposición este blog únicamente con fines educativos, así como para brindarle información general y una comprensión general de la ley, no para brindar asesoramiento legal específico. Al utilizar este sitio de blog, usted comprende que no existe una relación de abogado-cliente entre usted y el editor del blog/sitio web. El Blog no debe utilizarse como sustituto del asesoramiento legal competente de un abogado profesional autorizado en su estado.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 10 May, 2024
This post will target how many J1 Teachers are in the US, that come from Mexico. This statistic helps put some things into perspective of how many J1 Teachers are currently in the US, as well as how many J1 Professionals come to the US. Since the J1 Teacher Program can be extended to 5 years, this post will do a 5-year lookback.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 10 May, 2024
This post will target how many J1 Teachers are in the US, that come from Colombia. Since the J1 Teacher Program can be extended to 5 years, this post will do a 5-year lookback.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 10 May, 2024
This post will cover one of the most common questions a J1 has, would the J1 Waiver permit employment? In short, the answer depends on the J1 Visa being Waived. A J1 can still work during their DS-2019 Authorized Period, with the same employer, and the same position. If the Sponsor DOES NOT terminate the J1 Status in the Government System, employment is still authorized. So, the Waiver would not stop employment, but it does not in of itself permit the employment. This is an important distinction, because others might see J1 Working, and they might misperceive the waiver authorizing it. If the DS-2019 is expiring or has already expired, the J1 Waiver DOES NOT grant: employment authorization driver's license renewal international travel In other words, the J1 Waiver is NOT A STATUS to remain in the US, that is what the J1 Visa does. The Waiver, at its core, is merely a process to BREAK a previous agreement to return abroad (home country) for a minimum of two years. Once the Waiver is approved, the J1 is able to seek a different immigration status, such as: Immigrate to the US (acquire Lawful Permanent Residence or Green Card) either through the I-485 Adjustment of Status process or the DS-260 Consular Process K-1 Fiance Visa H Employment Visa L Employment Visa If working beyond the J1 Visa and without employment authorization, most are ineligible for Employment Visas, and Green Card immigration filings may be barred or deemed inadmissible for I-9 Fraud. More information about the J1 Waiver can be seen on our website . If you are in need of J1 Waiver Assistance, please feel free to contact our office for a Consultation . Related Blog Posts: https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/colombian-j1-no-objection-statement-nos-waiver-explained https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/my-ds-2019-is-blank-how-do-i-know-if-i-am-subject-to-the-j1-212e-2-year-home-residency-requirement https://www.fickeymartinezlaw.com/j1-waiver-statistics-and-approval-rating Disclaimer: This Blog is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
By Franchesco Fickey Martinez 10 May, 2024
¡Cómo la bancarrota afecta la inmigración y la naturalización! La quiebra puede ser un proceso muy confuso, muy parecido a la inmigración. Las preguntas más comunes son: ¿Tengo que ser ciudadano estadounidense para declararme en quiebra? ¿La bancarrota afectará mi estatus migratorio? ¿Puede un inmigrante indocumentado declararse en quiebra? ¿Puede la quiebra afectar mi solicitud de ciudadanía? En general, una declaración de quiebra no afectaría una declaración de inmigración. La bancarrota está disponible para ciudadanos estadounidenses y no estadounidenses (como residentes permanentes legales, titulares de DACA, titulares de TPS e incluso inmigrantes indocumentados). Para declararse en quiebra, debe decir toda la verdad. La información proporcionada en la presentación debe ser precisa y su número de Seguro Social o ITIN debe ser exacto y suyo. Por lo tanto, cualquier persona que tenga una tarjeta de seguro social legal emitida por el gobierno o un ITIN puede declararse en quiebra. ¿Cuándo puede la quiebra afectar una presentación de inmigración, como el ajuste de estatus o la naturalización? El hecho de declararse en quiebra no afectaría una presentación de inmigración; sin embargo, el fraude, el perjurio y la tergiversación pueden descalificar a un inmigrante para un beneficio de inmigración por motivos de tergiversación o de mal carácter moral. Aquí hay algunos escenarios posibles donde las acciones de quiebra incorrectas pueden dañar una presentación de inmigración: Un declarante de bancarrota inmediatamente solicita una tarjeta de crédito con la completa intención de presentar el Capítulo 7 de Bancarrota para saldar la nueva deuda. En este escenario se puede denegar la quiebra y se puede considerar que el declarante tiene un carácter moral deficiente, lo que puede denegar una solicitud de naturalización o impedir una tarjeta verde en una presentación de ajuste de estatus. Un declarante de quiebra utilizó una tarjeta/número de Seguro Social falso, robado o adquirido de manera fraudulenta. Este acto sería una forma de perjurio, que puede negar una solicitud de naturalización o impedir una Tarjeta Verde en una solicitud de Ajuste de Estatus. [Nota: el hecho de que una Tarjeta de Seguro Social sea real no significa que haya sido adquirida legalmente. El uso de documentos falsos o una presentación de inmigración fraudulenta puede ser tan malo como que la tarjeta de Seguro Social sea falsa o robada. Un declarante de quiebra es indocumentado y utiliza múltiples números sociales, ITIN y otros números del IRS para falsificar presentaciones 1099 y tergiversar los ingresos sujetos a impuestos en una declaración de impuestos. Este perjurio con respecto a los ingresos invalidaría cualquier declaración de quiebra y puede negar una presentación de naturalización o impedir una tarjeta verde en una presentación de ajuste de estatus. Si tengo una inquietud, ¿con quién debo hablar: un abogado de inmigración o un abogado de quiebras? En caso de duda, lo mejor sería hablar con ambos tipos de abogados. Alternativamente, Nuestra oficina maneja tanto Inmigración como Bancarrota . Por lo tanto, seríamos una "ventanilla única" y determinaríamos sus derechos y evaluaríamos sus riesgos.  Descargo de responsabilidad: El abogado o el editor del bufete de abogados pone a disposición este blog únicamente con fines educativos, así como para brindarle información general y una comprensión general de la ley, no para brindar asesoramiento legal específico. Al utilizar este sitio de blog, usted comprende que no existe una relación de abogado-cliente entre usted y el editor del blog/sitio web. El Blog no debe utilizarse como sustituto del asesoramiento legal competente de un abogado profesional autorizado en su estado.
More Posts
Share by: